Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дохён рснц | dhn lashes

@dhnlashes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

121subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003385329265
TypeChannel
Username@dhnlashes
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dhnlashes

Growth

1151211186 August 2026 — 115 subscribers6 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116 subscribers14 August 2026 — 121 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–122 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:58121+5
9 Aug 2026, 05:16116no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:00116+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:08115first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
154.6%
avg views ÷ 121 subscribers
Avg views / post
187
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (21 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total3,554
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4238.5%
❤‍🔥3128.4%
🔥2018.3%
💋1311.9%
😍32.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC273 viewsread 9 August 2026

окошек на август осталось совсем мало🥰

4 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

девочки, огромная просьба, если записываетесь сами через онлайн запись и я не отписалась вам в личные сообщения, то скиньте стикер это значит, что я просто не могу вас найти в тг🥹

❤‍🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC99 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

запрос был «хочу реснички, чтоб все ах*ели» ну мы точно в афиге, ещё и с ноготочками от Ликси вчера вообще обе красотки были с максимально креативными ресницами🌸 ✨все красные реснички, которые вставляются в наращивание — ярко-красные на солнце!

❤‍🔥62

3 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC105 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

такое вчера было

10❤‍🔥6

2 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC110 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я плачу😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️

❤‍🔥63

31 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC134 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

вас стало так много🥺❤️

💋8

30 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC209 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ещё 2 красотки вчера пополнили коллекцию моих работ🛐 #work@dhnlashes

❤‍🔥43🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC207 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

окошечки на август уже в дикиди🥰 а если вы не знаете, что хочется душе или просто сложно сориентироваться в приложении, то лс всегда открыто❤️ @dohyunaaa записаться на ресницы #online@dhnlashes

3

28 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC197 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🅰🅰🅰🅰🅰🅰🅰🅰🅰 #work@dhnlashes (мои работы) #online@dhnlashes (запись) #price@dhnlashes (прайс) #reviews@dhnlashes (ваши отзывы) #address@dhnlashes (адрес) #useful@dhnlashes (полезное) #ftf@dhnlashes (лайф контент) теперь всё можно будет найти по хэштегам❤️

💋5

27 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC199 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

они блестят🥺 это соу кьют #work@dhnlashes

6🔥3😍1

27 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC172 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я вам такое покажу это просто отпад

❤‍🔥42

25 Jul 2026, 08:43 UTC185 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кошечки, слёзно прошу у вас прощения, что так долго выкладываю окошки в этом месяце, но, к сожалению, мне приходится ждать расписание на второй работе, которое до сих пор не дали😔 Со следующего месяца я буду выкладывать окошки стабильно 20 числа, чтобы вам было удобно❤️

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dhnlashes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

что бы вы хотели увидеть тут?

  1. полезные посты (как подготовиться к наращиванию, почему могут осыпаться раньше и тд.)71%
  2. знакомство с мастером48%
  3. о процедурах (чем отличаются эффекты, как выбрать эффект и тд.)81%
  4. личный контент (обычный лайфстайл)38%
  5. экспертность (почему наращивание такое долгое, как я стерилизую инструменты, почему так дорого и тд.43%
  6. сезонные темы (летний уход, осенние тренды)52%

The shares total 333%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

девочки, задалась вопросом, а нужно ли сделать для вас пост с навигацией по каналу?

  1. не, не надо0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 386,721 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дохён рснц | dhn lashes” (@dhnlashes), 121 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dhnlashes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.