Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MedJourney – رحلتك في عالم الطب

@dhftyyy8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

617subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002346405495
TypeChannel
Username@dhftyyy8
Description🌍 MedJourney Yemen مكان يجمع كل طلاب الطب في اليمن 📚 مراجع – 🧠 معلومات – 🩺 نصائح طبية معًا نحو التميز في عالم الطب بوت التواصل @Whhwhwhwhbot
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/dhftyyy8

Growth

617618617.57 Aug 2026, 15:45 — 618 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:53 — 617 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:02 — 617 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:458 Aug 2026, 03:02
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 617–618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:02617no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:53617-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:45618first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 617 subscribers
Avg views / post
128
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,297
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
464
Videos
167
Links
124

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2946.0%
🤣2539.7%
😁46.35%
💔23.17%
11.59%
🔥11.59%
😭11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 01:27 UTC12 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

نضحك ونحزن ونحن نتذكر طفولتنا الجميلة… 🥹❤️ أيام الكرتون، والضحكة من القلب، والأشياء البسيطة التي كانت تصنع فرحتنا. لكن ونحن نسترجع هذه الذكريات، نتذكر أطفال غزة الذين حُرموا من طفولة كهذه… 💔🇵🇸 أطفال كان من حقهم أن يضحكوا ويلعبوا ويحلموا، لا أن يعيشوا الخوف والحرب. نحن نحِنّ لطفولتنا… وهم يتمنون فقط أن يعيشوا طفولة آمنة. الرحمة لأطفال غزة، وفلسطين تبقى في القلب دائمًا. 🇵🇸❤️‍🩹

💔2

Signed ༺اٰيــمــن الشُّــريــحــي ༻

7 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

▪️صارحني لتلقي النقد البناء بسرية تامة ▫️ هنا يمكنك ارسال اي رسالة لي , انا مستعد لمواجهة الصراحة 😅 . - تبرع لإستمرار عمل بوت صارحني 🎁 -

3

7 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

هكذا تكون حالات يوم الجمعة :

🤣31

Signed .

7 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔔هل تعلم أن الجفاف الخفيف قد يُشخَّص أحيانًا كخطأ على أنه "قلة تركيز" أو "كسل"؟! 🛜فقدان 1-2% فقط من سوائل الجسم يكفي للتأثير على الذاكرة قصيرة المدى والتركيز، دون أن يشعر الشخص بالعطش الواضح بعد. 📌علامات تستحق الانتباه: ⬅️جفاف الفم ⬅️صداع خفيف متكرر ⬅️تعب دون سبب واضح ⬅️لون البول الداكن 📝الحل بسيط: لا تنتظر العطش، اشرب الماء بانتظام على مدار اليوم.

1

6 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الأخطاء عند قياس الضغط تعطيك معدل غير طبيعي مما يسبب لك القلق.. 🔴لذا نقدم لك الأخطاء الشائعة التي عليك تفاديها عند قياس الضغط وطرق التعامل معها: 1⃣وضعية الجلوس: 🛜يمكن أن يؤدي الجلوس الخاطئ أثناء قياس ضغط الدم إلى ارتفاعه قبل البدء بقياس ضغط الدم، عليك الجلوس على الكرسي بطريقة صحيحة، قم بتثبيت قدميك في الأرض بطريقة تريحك، واجلس بظهر مفرود. 2⃣موضع الذراع: 🛜إذا كانت ذراعك بوضع غير مريح فإن أرقام ضغط الدم قد تكون أعلى 3⃣

1

6 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC100 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

لا تخاف هههههههه خريج جامعة صنعاء بمعدل 100%😂😂😂

😁41🤣1😭1

Signed .

6 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ربّ هَبْ لِي من لَّدُنك خيرًا واسِعًا حلالًا طيِّبًا، واجمّع بيني وبين ما حَوَت بهِ نفسي؛ ووسِّع علىٰ رُوحي، وباعد بيني وبين مَدارج الفِتن، وارزقني الجنَّة ومَا قَرب إليها من قولٍ أو عَمل. سُبحانك أنت المُنعم الواسع.💗

2

5 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

قلتلكم حطو واقي شمس متبوش عاجبكم منضركم هكي :

🤣41

5 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣3

Signed ༺اٰيــمــن الشُّــريــحــي ༻

5 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC139 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

مله انا مشتيش اراجع 🥴🥴 الطلاب يجوا بنفوسهم

🤣6

Signed يوسف الهندي

5 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC144 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

أنا كذا . 😂 أول ما أطلع من القاعة أحس نفسي دكتور المادة، أراجع مع الكل... وفي الأخير أرجع أندم على كل سؤال راجعته

🤣7

5 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC165 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الطب منهج مكثّف وليس حفظاً سطحياً المنهج الطبي من أكثر المناهج تعقيداً وتشعّباً ويتضمن تقييمات عملية وسريرية ونظرية دقيقة لا يمكن حتى لواضعي الامتحانات أنفسهم الحصول فيها على 100%التقييم الحقيقي صمم ليفارق بين القدرات والمهارات وليس ليُوزع العلامات الكاملة بالجملة ​واستبدال المعيار العلمي بالولاءات السياسيّة عندما تُمنح الدرجات العالية والمصيرية لمن يحضرون الفعاليات والدورات ويُظهِرون الولاء والجماعة الحوثية تتحول ا

71🔥1

Signed ياسين منصر الحميري

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dhftyyy8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 310,111 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MedJourney – رحلتك في عالم الطب” (@dhftyyy8), 617 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dhftyyy8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.