常平思思 @AriesFeng41 号被用来诈骗定金,请各位群友朋友勿相信!
❤1

Channel
@dgfzp
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002651009896 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dgfzp |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dgfzp |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 364 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 360 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 359 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 360 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 361 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 361 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 62.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 37.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
常平思思 @AriesFeng41 号被用来诈骗定金,请各位群友朋友勿相信!
❤1
给了定金200,后续支付宝给了500,总共700诈骗
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
【辣辣的牛子研究中心】三个人做诈骗,在厚街寮厦站大江阳光一号,做这个定金200诈骗
❤1
@xiaomi00022 诈骗联系方式,谨防受骗
冒充我的骗子,大家不要信并举报骚扰并退出
缅北骗子,被骗 200+800=1000,请大家务必约课认准榜上老师!
傻逼鸡婆貌似是代聊,看人下菜,我第一次见,谁去谁吃屎💩。 人照0,服务态度差的臭🐔,原名厚街慧慧、现名厚街珍珍 鸡婆号:@huihui101423 鸡婆频道: @huihui101324
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
被骗经历
骗子骗客户定金,大家留意一下
❤2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @dgfzp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东莞防诈骗黑板” (@dgfzp), 364 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dgfzp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.