常平琪琪 诈骗 @Rolling1m 🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲

Channel
东莞出击避坑黑榜💣
@dg98hb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,942subscribers
+73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002799511500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dg98hb |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dg98hb |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 2,942 | +72 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 2,870 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 2,869 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 2,869 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.7%
- avg views ÷ 2,942 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,110
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 November 2025 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,328 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
110 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 88.2% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.64% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 3.64% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
大朗奶昔 诈骗 @naiximei 🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲
诈骗 @qiqibao7899 🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲
🈲诈骗 南城梦熙: @mengxi258 🈲诈骗
#南城 洛怡 🈲此号被盗: @Yyf2565 🈲
上课时间:3月10号 验证留名:🐍你一脸 所在位置:南城 老师名称:崽崽 老师电报:@nczz520 上课价格:700 妹子年龄: 妹子体重: 总体评分(0) 容貌评分:0 身材评分:0 服务评分:0 环境评分:0 自由评论:什么服务没有 照片是身份没有纹身的 真人有纹身 洗澡不给洗 口不给口 完全就是骗子 谁去谁煞笔 结束了以后电报就给我拉黑了
❤8👎2
上课时间:3/8 验证留名:Forever 所在位置:塘厦华堂 老师名称:亚朵 老师电报:https://t.me/yadup992 上课价格:600p 妹子年龄:目测 30➕ 妹子体重: 60kg 总体评分(满分10分) 容貌评分:0 身材评分:0 服务评分:0 环境评分:1 自由评论::避雷!!! 老师洗完澡连张擦水的纸都不给 🐻小的要死 目测只有 A 只有洗吹做没有其他服务 纯纯低能儿 骗人的东西 又老又丑 还要出来卖 提交报告:@feibiao613bot 报告来源所在群: https://t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1
❤5
98集团群每一份报告都来自群友,基本都带转发来源,除非群友不愿意直接转发,坚决不做收好处费假报告✊ 98群报告模板: 上课时间:2025-10-18 验证留名:teki 所在位置:大朗 老师名称:#梦瑶 老师电报:@mengyao6668888 上课价格:700 妹子年龄:19 总体评分(满分10分): 容貌评分: 9 身材评分: 9 服务评分: 2 环境评分: 9 自由评论: 妹子的确漂亮,身材也好,但是一直摆着个臭脸,只能自己找话题,气氛极度尴尬。课表写着可以🐍吻,可以69,妹子说不可以舔下面接受不了。好我就不舔我就闻闻。然后鼻子不小心碰了下,马上弹了起来,我说我没有舔,只是鼻子碰了下。她既然污蔑说她看到我舔了,把我气😤得。我都没舔她怎么可能看见。口下面的时候一直说我下面味道冲。我出击这么久了她是唯一一个说我有味道的人。口了几下说能不能手打。要是可以手打我不如自己打。亲也不让亲,一直在躲。实在没有什么兴趣,一二三出…
❤10
98集团群每一份报告都来自群友,基本都带转发来源,除非群友不愿意直接转发,坚决不做收好处费假报告✊ 98群报告模板: 上课时间:11.22 验证留名:喜欢海 所在位置:大朗 老师名称:大朗#梦瑶 老师电报:@mengyao6668888 上课价格:700 妹子年龄:18 总体评分(满分10分): 容貌评分: 9 身材评分:9 服务评分:0 环境评分: 0 自由评论: 深夜看到嫩妹果断出击,进门看到跟频道照片基本一致,然后交了水费一起洗澡。洗完澡后,先让我上楼等,先让我感觉到的是暖气很足,床边角落满地都是一坨坨用过的纸巾。在床上等了好久好久,老师才上楼,我当时感觉人都快要睡着了。我问她为什么这么久才上来,她说太冷了,不想出来了。 接下来是前戏:咱俩一人一根漱口水,漱完我问她吐哪里,她说吐角落垃圾桶里,吐完之后,我说先亲一下嘴。在亲嘴的时候,老师一直紧闭着嘴巴,我试图用舌头撬开伸进去都不行,每次亲几下就说无法呼吸了,就一直…
❤18
上课时间:11.10 验证留名:雷明 所在位置:东莞长安,深圳松岗 老师名称:丽莎 老师电报:@Lisha6699 上课价格:1200pp 妹子年龄: 妹子体重: 总体评分(满分0分) 容貌评分: 身材评分: 服务评分: 环境评分:担保群, 自由评论: https://t.me/jsdb444担保群,星际全国楼凤,,交1200pp定金399,交完就接黑了,担保群主管也来骂人,骗子群 提交报告:@feibiao613bot 报告来源所在群: https://t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1
❤5🤣4🤔1
上课时间:1/12 验证留名: 所在位置:东城 老师名称:叮当 老师电报:@mengbao69 上课价格:6p 妹子年龄:19 妹子体重: 48 总体评分(满分10分) 容貌评分:0 身材评分:0 服务评分:0 环境评分:0 自由评论:放人鸽子,大晚上都开车到她楼下了,突然来一句她不方便接单。说什么她身体不舒服。推荐去找她姐妹,她姐妹是个老鸡真实年龄36,把资料改成25。第二天一看她自己又开始接单,两个都是骗子。不想干可以不干,还到处骗人放人家鸽子。 提交报告:@feibiao613bot 报告来源所在群: https://t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1
❤2
上课时间:1/13 验证留名: 所在位置:东城 老师名称:oi 老师电报:@oi9991 上课价格:6p 妹子年龄:19 妹子体重: 100+ 总体评分(满分10分) 容貌评分:0 身材评分:0 服务评分:0 环境评分:0 自由评论:人照基本不符,服务奇差,客人自己洗澡。口活奇差。还是是个坦克,皮肤粗糙。声音难听。事后不会帮忙擦,需要客人自己擦。 提交报告:@feibiao613bot 报告来源所在群: https://t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dg98hb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 168,573 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dg98hb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东莞出击避坑黑榜💣” (@dg98hb), 2,942 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dg98hb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.