Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东莞靠谱出击报告

Channel

东莞靠谱出击报告

@DGKPCJ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,347subscribers

+511 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003089443744
TypeChannel
Username@DGKPCJ
Description各群报告榜鱼龙混杂,为方便群友。此报告榜将靠谱出击选手设为管理自已分享报告。如发表不靠谱报告,将踢出发表权限。(限发表98在榜老师报告) 出现在此的好评报告不容易,对老师是种认可,能在此发表报告的群友,也说明在东莞有一定公信力,老师接待应更加细心周到😋
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DGKPCJ

Growth

7,8368,3478,091.57 August 2026 — 7,836 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,960 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,163 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,347 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,759–8,424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:148,347+184
13 Aug 2026, 13:078,163+203
10 Aug 2026, 16:527,960+122
8 Aug 2026, 02:147,838+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:177,836first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 8,347 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.164%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held57 (1 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total47,074
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Videos
2
Links
576

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 33 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5985.5%
😁45.80%
👏34.35%
👍22.90%
💩11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC626 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:8月17日 验证留名:猪哥 所在位置:南城 老师名称:菜菜 老师电报:@cczgl 上课价格:600p 妹子年龄:18 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分: 9 身材评分:8 服务评分:8 环境评分:9 自由评论:三返三嫂,在此点名三哥(喜新厌旧的cs),那就我替三哥来耕地了。排课的老毛病依然发挥稳定,妹妹是好妹妹,任盘蟒舌不催人,紧度略有下降不知道三哥是不是偷偷去了不过依然紧。后入的时候叫嫂子别回头我是david。 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

😁21

Signed 梁山伯与猪硬来

17 Aug 2026, 10:24 UTC402 viewsread 18 August 2026

此号被盗 @MiNi1129 🈲🈲😁😁

Signed 肥膘(愿世界没有骗子)

17 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC744 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:8.16 验证留名:Tiger (3.0) 所在位置:南城 老师名称:阿娇 老师电报:@ajiao550 上课价格:500p 妹子年龄:27 总体评分(满分10分): 10 容貌评分: 10 身材评分:10 服务评分:10 环境评分:10 自由评论:三反娇姐了,我太吃服务了,最值得反的老师,冲就完事了,俗话说东有小妖南有阿娇,太久没有出击了,险些就被阿娇秒了,进门老师先拿了瓶水解解渴,交了水费,之后就到了紧张刺激的环节了,把衣服脱光光,进到浴室里面全身洗白白净净,还有水中萧,简直爽的不要不要的,随后擦干净上楼,开始了AB面的服务了,一应俱全应有尽有,十分的全面,毒🐉也是猛的一匹,一套炫技口活,吞吐过程中还能用舌头顶着二弟,在嘴里面螺旋升天,后面受不了了,迅速带上套,先是女上,妹妹很

1👍1

Signed Tiger(3. 0)在岸

16 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC874 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:8/16 验证留名:蛙 所在位置:南城 老师名称:招财 老师电报:@Aas12333 上课价格:6p 妹子年龄:没问,反正是湖南嫩妹 总体评分(满分10分): 8 自由评论:160± 🐻A+ 黄皮,人照6-7分,妆容画的比较淡,颜值一般,可能长发好看些,剪短了显得有点土了,小面积纹身,左手一个闺蜜和自己名字,人蛮健谈 服务:嫩妹三件套+🐍(有烟味)+69(未尝试),服务相对简单,有自备漱口水,会帮忙擦身,服务态度OK 缺点:🈶烟味,颜值一般(明日接头发,看了下照片,长发应该会好看些) 适合嫩妹🐍教党 由于昨日得知某位之前去过老师大我两轮,今日养胃,属实没干劲,今日真真真123出水,我的问题,与老师无关 一篇失败的报告,可忽略 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://te

2

Signed Hachiman (迷茫🐸🐸)

16 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC591 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @dg98hb

大朗艾艾 诈骗 @DLaiai (推假处,骗定金) 🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲🈲

💩1

Signed 肥膘(愿世界没有骗子)

15 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 18 August 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:2026-8-15 验证留名:禾田 所在位置:厚街 老师名称:小咪 老师电报:@cmhshk 上课价格:1200pp 妹子年龄:少妇 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分: 8 身材评分:8 服务评分:9 环境评分:9 自由评论: 老师是内蒙古人,身材很苗条,刚进门就非常热情交了水费然后进去洗澡,老师很认真的帮忙洗就是浴室有点小一边洗还在一边口那是相当舒服, 洗完澡后先是上服务也是非常舒服,最后进入主题顺利出水,体验不错 东莞避坑交流(老师🈲入): https://telegram.me/+vipFpFF0tnEwOTJl 更多靠谱报告👉👉👉: @DGKPCJ

Signed 禾田(改正归邪)

15 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎰 大朗婷宝半价/红包🧧活动 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-婷宝的朋友圈 🎫 加入-东莞抽奖优惠发布榜 🎫 加入-东莞靠谱出击报告 🎫 加入-东莞师生学术交流(禁广告) 🍀 每1分中奖几率加1倍 ⤷在群中输入「喜+1」 🎁 奖品内容: 100红包🧧 × 3 P半价券🎫 × 1 100优惠券🎫 × 5 200优惠券🎫 × 5 💡 活动说明: 开奖后一星期有效,炸号无效。 兑奖联系: @tingbao321 东莞避坑交流群: https://t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1 (🈲老师) 群里近期发布大量抽奖🎟️,在群置顶🔝留意关注别错过😻! 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月21日 17时00分00秒

2

Signed 老师活动优惠抽奖管家

15 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,050 views0 reactionsread 18 August 2026

东莞靠谱报告为靠谱狼友亲自分享,东莞最具有参考作用报告。每一份报告都由出击本人亲自提交。点击署名即可与出击本人交流! 报告模板: 上课时间:8-15 验证留名:Jane 所在位置:南城 老师名称:米兜 老师电报:@TiMi5123 上课价格:700 妹子年龄:20出头 总体评分(满分10分): 9 容貌评分: 8.5 身材评分:11 服务评分:8.5(无蛇无69) 环境评分:7(懂得都懂) 自由评论: 颜值不差,皮肤黄偏黑?(现场灯光比较暗)身高估计有165-168吧,对于本人而言无压力,身材非常好,瘦底大波 估计有d+,手感不错天然大奶,一手难握,老师说准备生理期奶头有点痛不能摸,能理解!腰部无赘肉,身材比例相当好,该有肉的地方有肉 服务:偏简单吧,三件套+舔咪咪,课表明确没有69+🐍(本人对蛇可有可无,69没玩过),会说骚话,服务前后都挺能聊(自带话题)! 🐍党跟69党可自动跳过,大奶党可以持续关注,老师比较佛系

Signed Jane-账号已停用

15 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC727 views0 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @DG98jituanPhoto

🎰 大朗小雨抽奖活动🎫 📮 抽奖条件: 🎫 加入-小雨的后花园 🎫 加入-东莞抽奖优惠发布榜 🎫 加入-东莞出击报告(不做假报告) 🎫 加入-东莞师生学术交流(禁广告) 🍀 每1分中奖几率加1倍 ⤷在群中输入「喜+1」 🎁 奖品内容: P半价券🎫 × 1 100优惠券🎫 × 10 PP200优惠券🎫 × 100 💡 活动说明: 开奖后一星期有效,炸号无效。 兑奖联系: @szz34_de 东莞避坑交流群: https://t.me/+I3kbipSXArw1MWU1 (🈲老师) 群里近期发布大量抽奖🎟️,在群置顶🔝留意关注别错过😻! 📅 开奖日期:(UTC+8) 2026年08月20日 16时00分00秒

Signed 肥膘(愿世界没有骗子)

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @DGKPCJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DGKPCJ edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 567,296 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东莞靠谱出击报告” (@DGKPCJ), 8,347 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DGKPCJ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.