Channel
@dezoomcamp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
30,418subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001708295427 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dezoomcamp |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dezoomcamp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 30,418 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 30,406 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 30,401 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 30,398 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 30,394 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 30,384 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 30,388 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 30,395 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 30,395 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
683 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 496 | 72.6% | |
| 👍 | 100 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 6.44% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 3.37% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.586% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.439% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.439% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.439% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.439% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.293% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.146% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.146% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 683reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 20 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Data Engineering Zoomcamp 2026 has officially wrapped up! You had 3 chances to submit your final project and review 3 peers. Congratulations to the 581 participants who successfully completed the course and earned their certificates! If you're one of the graduates, you can find your well-deserved certificate in your course enrollment profile. We encourage you to celebrate this milestone by sharing it on Linked…
❤99👍15👏5👎2🔥1
Now Data Engineering Zoomcamp is almost over and I'm focusing on updating LLM Zoomcamp - the course about using GenAI, RAG and Agents We will have multiple workshops prior to the course start date which will be used as the videos for the course when it starts The first one is today. Join me if you're interested in GenAI!
👍35❤6
I'm starting a workshop series to update the content of LLM Zoomcamp. Each workshop will update the content of one course module: May 11: Build Your First RAG Application May 18: From RAG to AI Agents: Function Calling and Tool Use May 21: Vector Databases May 27: RAG and Agents Evaluation June 3: Monitoring LLM Applications
❤72👍22👏6🔥3👎1
If you submitted your project for the last attempt, now it's time to evaluate your peers You can find the assignments here: https://courses.datatalks.club/de-zoomcamp-2026/project/project3/eval Have fun!
❤9👏4
Judging by the questions in Slack, I realize that our documentation may be not complete or straightforward I reorganized it a bit and here it is https://datatalks.club/docs/courses/zoomcamp-logistics/ I hope you fill find the answers to your questions (especially around projects and peer reviews)
❤19
Some of you forgot to submit the project, and some of you forgot to do peer reviews. I see from Telegram and Slack that there are quite a few of you in this situation. For those who already have a project but haven't submitted it yet, we have opened a third attempt. It has a very strict deadline, so you won't have time to develop a new project. You can only submit the existing one. https://courses.datatalks.club/d…
❤15🙏3
The certificates are ready! You'll find them in your enrollment profile for the course Don't forget to share them on LinkedIn! Thanks everyone for being a part of this course!
❤43🔥5
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥18❤7
The form for submitting the second attempt is now closed. Now time to learn from your peers! If you submitted a project for attempt 2, you'll find the project review assignments here: https://courses.datatalks.club/de-zoomcamp-2026/project/project2/eval Have fun!
❤25
We have just scored project attempt 1 Congratulations to the 269 course participants who passed it! We will release the certificates for you later along with the second batch If you haven't passed it, you can improve it and submit one more time Note that if you did pass the project, submitting it again (even with improvements) is considered self-plagiarism. Please don't do it. But you can submit another project if…
❤33🔥2
Great job working on your projects! Now it's time to learn from your peers If you submitted your project for attempt, you will find your review assignments here: https://courses.datatalks.club/de-zoomcamp-2026/project/project1/eval If not - you still have time for attempt 2. Have fun!
❤26👍5
A quick update: the Bruin project competition is now open to everyone! This means your submission does not have to be the same as your Zoomcamp final project. Even if you are not participating in the course, or if you are using other tech for your Zoomcamp final project, you can still build a separate project with Bruin, submit it to the competition, and compete for prizes. Prizes: 🔸 Mac Mini for an outstanding p…
❤29👍7🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dezoomcamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Data Engineering Zoomcamp” (@dezoomcamp), 30,418 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dezoomcamp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.