Video message, posted without a caption
🎉27❤18🔥12🥰11💯9🏆8💋8❤🔥6

Channel
@dexboosterinfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
580subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001964665126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dexboosterinfo |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dexboosterinfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 580 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:20 | 581 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 581 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,155 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 262 | 22.7% | |
| ❤ | 254 | 22.0% | |
| 🎉 | 243 | 21.0% | |
| 👍 | 236 | 20.4% | |
| 👌 | 38 | 3.29% | |
| 🏆 | 26 | 2.25% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 2.25% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 1.73% | |
| 💋 | 18 | 1.56% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 1.39% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 0.693% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 0.519% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.173% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2025 to 30 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dexboosterinfo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 January 2025 to 30 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2025 to 30 January 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Video message, posted without a caption
🎉27❤18🔥12🥰11💯9🏆8💋8❤🔥6
📣 Что такое сервис AXEL? 🤔 👍 Комплексный инструмент: автоматизирующий работу вашей команды 24/7! 🤝 Автоматизация ботами: простой бот, реферальный бот, чат-бот — ваша виртуальная команда готова поддержать вас круглосуточно! 👏 Реклама и вовлечение: эффективные методы привлечения целевой аудитории, увеличение охвата и вовлечённости ваших клиентов! 💵 Партнёрская программа: обратный маркетинг позволяет привлекать новых п…
🎉19🏆16❤15💋10👌3🔥3👍2
Страх остановиться и подумать — бегство от размышлений в бесконечную активность Многие предприниматели попадают в ловушку вечной занятости. Бесконечные встречи, звонки, мелкие задачи заполняют каждую минуту дня. Кажется, что остановка — это потеря времени, а размышления — роскошь, которую нельзя себе позволить в условиях жёсткой конкуренции. На самом деле постоянная активность часто маскирует страх столкнуться с неу…
🎉11❤10🔥10👍4👌3
🏆 Вчера был отмечен исторический рубеж: впервые инвесторы получили доступ к компании, владеющей TON, котирующейся на американском фондовом рынке (тикер: VERB). Эта компания направляет 558 миллионов долларов на накопление Toncoin — никогда не продавая, а только покупая больше со временем. ↗️ Акции VERB более чем удвоились в первый день торгов, подняв рыночную капитализацию выше 1 миллиарда долларов и обеспечив компан…
❤14👍10🎉5🔥4👌3🥰3
Найм на культуру vs найм на навыки — что важнее для команды Большинство компаний нанимают на резюме: опыт, дипломы, технические навыки. Но через полгода оказывается, что отличный специалист не вписывается в команду, создаёт конфликты или тормозит процессы. Навыки можно развить, культурные ценности — нет. Человек, который не разделяет принципы открытости, ответственности или клиентоориентированности, будет саботиров…
🎉9🔥9❤8👍8👌3👏2
"Подкаст «Короч» | Как работать с искусственным интеллектом?". ⚙️ 📎 "Короч" GigaChat уже помогает в работе. 🎙 Обсуждили использование искусственного интеллекта, не боясь самых смелых прогнозов на будущее, и упоминается, что технологии искусственного интеллекта могут заменить людей в различных профессиях, от журналиста до архитектора. Спикеры выпуска: ▫️Сергей Марков — директор по развитию технологий искусственного и…
👍13🎉8❤7🔥6👏4
У ТЕБЯ ПРОБЛЕМЫ С УДЕРЖАНИЕМ ТРАФИКА? 🤔 Знакомая ситуация: привлекаешь много новых людей, но аудитория утекает сквозь пальцы 😱 ТОП-лидеры годами ищут новый трафик, а мы собираем, накапливаем и прогреваем аудиторию прямо в наших ботах 📣 👍 Наши достижения: ▫️За год собрали базу > 90 000 чел. ▫️Конверсия стабильно держится на уровне 30–40% 🤔Почему именно бот? Потому что это твой надежный инструмент сбора, хранения …
🔥10🎉7👍7❤6👌4👏3
💻 Боты ИИ захватили пользовательское пространство! 🤝Сегодня мир технологий стремительно меняется — искусственным интеллектом пользуются практически везде, включая сферу сетевого маркетинга (MLM). 👌 Боты помогают автоматизировать процессы, повысить эффективность и упростить работу менеджеров и консультантов. 👏 Мы тоже не остались в стороне: наша команда активно применяет бот-помощника для оптимизации процессов прод…
🔥11🎉9👍9❤5💯4
ДАРИМ ВАМ KIA K5 GT LINE ЗА ПОДПИСКУ - ВСЕГО НА ЧЕТЫРЕ КАНАЛА ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ✅ БИЗНЕС ЦЕНТР-MLM ✅ ТРАФИК ИНСТРУМЕНТЫ-ОБУЧЕНИЕ ✅ ТУМАН ✅ АВТОАЙК Всего лишь нужно подписаться на четыре Телеграм канала и нажать кнопку УЧАСТВОВАТЬ! И 27 мая 2025 года бот рандомно определит победителя Kia K5. И как будет определен счастливчик, Настя Туман лично свяжется с вами и будет вручать машину 🎉 И да, можете участвовать с любой страны.…
🔥20👍18❤13🎉10👌2🥰2👏1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍17🎉15🔥14❤8👌4
💻 AXEL 2.0: МОЗГОВОЙ ШТУРМ ВАШЕГО БИЗНЕСА! 👏 💥 ПРАКТИКА, ЦЕНА, КАЧЕСТВО 💥 🤝 Погрузитесь в мир инноваций с Axel 2.0 — платформой, которая объединяет искусственный интеллект и автоматизацию для революции в вашем бизнесе! 🚀 ❤️🔥 ТРЕНД НОМЕР ОДИН НА РЫНКЕ ИНТЕРНЕТ БИЗНЕСА ❤️🔥 Axel 2.0 предлагает уникальные инструменты для модернизации и роста вашего бизнеса. От персональных ботов до автоматизации процессов — всё, что …
❤18🔥15🎉13👍7👏2🥰1
🚀 50% КЭШБЭК + РОЗЫГРЫШ 300 ТОНН со значком TONCA$H SBT! 💰 🙏 Gemswall x TONCA$H принесет вам непревзойденные награды! 💵 Получите значок SBT , чтобы получить 50% кэшбэка за каждую покупку, соответствующую условиям, И шанс выиграть приз из призового фонда в 300 TON! 🎁 🏆 Победителей выберет Колесо Фортуны — будет ли удача на вашей стороне? 💵💵 🧭 Получите свой SBT сейчас и начните зарабатывать! Присоединяйтесь сейчас! …
🔥32👍11❤9🎉9💯3⚡2❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dexboosterinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 369,884 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dexboosterinfo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DEXPROTON 💎 RUS” (@dexboosterinfo), 580 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dexboosterinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.