when ya back

Channel
D6. PREDAMAGE
@dexanty
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
332subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002231444870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dexanty |
| Description | anything / collab @predamagebot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 25 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dexanty |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 332 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 332 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 25 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.16%
- avg views ÷ 332 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 10.5
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (25 September 2024 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 42 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 7
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
wkwkwk kangen banget
ak kgen
hy
hy
bentar ya predam, kita bakal oplink setelah opcrew
stay tune aja
happy girlfriend day predam 🤍🤍 BUAT YG CEWE YA !!!
Sticker, posted without a caption
✅ BACHATA COLLABORATION 🤔 ✅ Liked by @OFCBACHATA and 990.987.283 others Big thanks for participation to all squad! This is our first collaboration, we hope that this collaboration can strengthen the relationship between all of us, success is always for all squads. ★☆ 𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗧𝗔𝗚'𝗦 ✅: @viuscars @ofcbandjor @thewalky @tracox @remanofc @Pauloxareas @bropodzwashere @jasdeisz @patsarea @struickwild @ofccibaye @ofcardo …
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ───────────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐋𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 ㅤㅤㅤ 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 @SANTALIEZ SUPERVISE, SCRUPULOUS, STAMP OUT! with very careful supervision, we are santaliez can eradicate all criminalization ㅤㅤㅤ ───────────────── ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⓘ 𝐒PECIAL 𝐓AG ⓘ @jasdeisz @OFCLOKSTARD @OVERKILLOFC @ofcintelijen @EDGLOS @ofcescalo @thewalky @usbalak @viuscars @predamage @berculley @DIXIESTHEACE @sencalls @kopdarpride @p4boysofc @ohsoker @TBROCK…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dexanty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 913,587 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@kopdarpride · 1,4462 postsLØKSTARD
@ofclokstard · 4672 posts𝐏𝐀𝐋𝐊𝐎𝐍𝐁𝐎𝐘𝐒 🇩🇴
@p4boysofc · 4332 postspredamage
@predamage · 22 posts🇴🇲 🪪 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗦𝗡𝗜𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗢𝗙. SANTALIEZ
@santaliez · 2,6732 posts.
@thewalky · 62 posts𝗕𝗢𝗥𝗡𝟰𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗞
@usbalak · 2,6552 postsMEMORIES VIUSCARS
@viuscars · 8342 postsDIXIES EXISTENCE (337 GALS LOADING...)
@DIXIESTHEACE · 1,3491 postEDGLOS BORN TO WIN 🏆
@EDGLOS · 2,0061 postForge The Sheild
@forgethesheild · 1281 post42, MASEXIEST
@masexiest · 8081 postBA-CHATA
@ofcbachata · 8551 postBANDJOR
@ofcbandjor · 2811 postCIBAYE UNLEASH
@ofccibaye · 1,0091 post• ─ 本部 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗝𝗘𝗡 𝟮𝟵𝟭 🇨🇳
@OFCINTELIJEN · 2,1561 post𝐏𝐑𝐔𝐆𝐀𝐋
@OFCPRUGAL · 1,1071 post𝐖𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐂𝐇𝐎
@ofcwerscho · 9331 postBORN TO BRONGE
@offcbronge · 2,6281 postSEE YOU ON TOP!
@offcpahay · 5461 post𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗞𝗜𝗟𝗟
@OVERKILLOFC · 19,8601 postpaulox
@Pauloxareas · 2491 postSAMPOΞRNA 🇵🇳 CLOSE BIG THANKS
@sampoerna6milds · 5,6191 postTRACOX
@tracox · 9991 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 9
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 9
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dexanty named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“D6. PREDAMAGE” (@dexanty), 332 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dexanty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.