Channel
@devfarhod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
301subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001215175120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @devfarhod |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/devfarhod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 301 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 302 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 302 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
200 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 90 | 45.0% | |
| 🔥 | 56 | 28.0% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 5.50% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 5.00% | |
| 👨💻 | 10 | 5.00% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 4.50% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 3.50% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 2.50% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.5% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Stiv Vozniak Toshkentda! Apple asoschilaridan biri, texnologiya afsonasi Stiv Vozniak CAU Texnik Sammitida mehmon! U Apple’ning yaratilishi, kelajak texnologiyalari va tadbirkorlik tafakkuri haqida gapiradi. Shuningdek, Shaxina Pulatova (AI), Ulug‘bek M. (Lucid Motors, eBay), Roman Lavrentyev (Uzum), Nika Kurdiani (TBC) kabi yirik spikerlar ham bo‘ladi. 📍 Markaziy Osiyo Universiteti, Advent Hall 📅 19-20 fevral 🚀 …
🏆6👍4
Boy bo‘lish uchun xohish emas, ehtiyoj darajasida yashang! 💡 Xohish – bu biz qilishni xohlaydigan narsalar. Ehtiyoj – bu qilmasak bo‘lmaydigan, majburiyat bo‘lgan narsalarimiz. Misol uchun: - 🍳 Uyda sog‘lom taom pishirib yeyish ehtiyoj, ko‘chada ovqatlanish esa xohish. - 👕 Tanani yopish uchun kiyim olish ehtiyoj, yangi uslub uchun kiyim olish esa xohish. Ehtiyojni qondirmasdan yashab bo‘lmaydi, lekin xohishlard…
👍17⚡3
Biror marta 29.895 qatorli "unit test" fayl yozganmisiz? 😇 Bizda bu odatiy holat. Biz kutubxonalarni manbaa kodini shunday olib, faylga qo'shib yuboramiz. 😂 @devfarhod
👨💻8😁7🤣2🏆1
Shu kunlarda biznes va pul haqida ko’p o’qiyapman va o’ylayapman. Odatda oddiy ishchi bo’lishimizga sabab, o’zimizni ishimizni boshlash xavf-xatarli ekanini o’ylaymiz. Balki yirik korxonalarda yirik ishlar qilishni xohlaymiz. Nima bo’lganda ham, xavf-xatar haqida gapirsak. Kimningdir qo’lida ishlash ham xavfsiz emas. Doim “Korxonani ishi yaxshi bo’lsinda, ishsiz qolib ketmayda.” - degan hadikda yashaymiz. Shunday …
👍9🔥5
Biznes kengaytirishning ikki turi haqida Ikkita biznesim muvaffaqiyatsizlikka uchradi, lekin bu faoliyat menga ko’p tajriba berdi. Shu tajribalardan biri bizneslar kengaytirish jihatidan ikki asosiy turga bo‘linishini o’rgandim: 1. Kengaytirish uchun kapital talab qiladigan bizneslar Bu turdagi bizneslarni yuritish nisbatan oson, lekin kengaytirish uchun katta mablag‘ kerak bo‘ladi. Misol: mini market. Market yur…
⚡2❤2👍1
Shu kunlarda pul haqida dasturlashdan ham ko'proq o'qiyotgan ekanman. 🤑 O'rganayotgan bilimlarimni sizlar bilan ham ulashaymi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#AITools NotClass — Bu uskuna YouTube videolari yoki podkastlarini to‘liq ko‘rmasdan turib, sizning aniq savolingizga tegishli qismini topib beradi. 🎯 Endi soatlab videolarni ko‘rib chiqish shart emas — kerakli javobni topish bir necha soniyalarda amalga oshadi! Shu kabi foydali AI uskunalari haqida ko‘proq bilishni istasangiz, kanalga obuna bo‘ling: 👉 @devfarhod .
👍8😍1
ChatGPT ning fikriga ko’ra mening hayotim yuqoridagi rasmdagi kabi ekan. 😎 Siz haqingizda qanday tasavvurga ega ekanini bilish uchun quyidagi “prompt” ni ChatGPT ga jo’nating. Based on what you know about me. Draw a picture of what you think my alter-egos life looks like @devfarhod
👍5🤣2❤1
Guruhda savol berishdi: “Agar top-tier engineer bo‘lolmasangiz, boshqa ish bilan shug‘ullanish kerak bo‘lgan zamon keldi deb hisoblaysizmi?” 🤔 Umidlaringizni so‘ndirmoqchi emasman, biroq bu haqiqatga yaqin. 🔍 Agar dasturlashni faqat yuqori daromad uchun tanlayotgan bo‘lsangiz, unda boshqa kasb bilan shug‘ullanganingiz ma’qul. Lekin agar dasturlashga qiziqib o‘rganayotgan bo‘lsangiz, unda o‘rganishda davom eting va …
❤2👍2🔥1😁1
Nega AI kelajakda super inson darajasidagi dasturchi bo’lishi mumkin? 🤖💡 Avvalroq, AI to’liq dasturchilar ishini egallashi qiyinligi haqidagi fikrlarimni bo’lishgan edim. Ammo bu borada aniq faktlar yetishmayotgani sababli qat’iy fikr bildira olmasdim. Keyingi izlanishlarim davomida, yangi bir tushunchaga duch keldim va bu, AI dasturlashni to’liqligicha egallashi mumkinligiga ishora qiladi. 🔍🧩 Hozirgi LLM (keng til…
👍4👨💻2
Yangi startap boshlamoqchi bo’lsangiz, iltimos, bir o’ylab ko’ring O’zbekistonda yangi loyihalarni katta korporatsiyalar kayfiyat uchun qiladi, yoki biznesmenlar aytiga qiziqib dasturchilarni yig’ib o’rtaga pul tashlaydi, yoki oyoqqa turgan, o’z sarmoyasi bor juda mard insonlar yaratadi. Yana tanlovlarda grant yutib sarmoya oladiganlar ham bor, lekin ko’p emas. Startap deganimda men pul keltiradigan, moliyalashtiri…
👍6
NPM da ko‘p ishlatiladigan buyruqlar to‘plami! 🚀 Bu havolani saqlab qo‘ying — juda ko‘p kerak bo‘ladi! Agar biror buyruqni unutib qo‘ysangiz, dokumentatsiyani yoki internetni kovlab o‘tirishingizga hojat qolmaydi. ChatGPT ni ham bezovta qilib yotmaysiz. 😊 👉 https://devhints.io/npm @devfarhod
👍4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @devfarhod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shu kunlarda pul haqida dasturlashdan ham ko'proq o'qiyotgan ekanman. 🤑 O'rganayotgan bilimlarimni sizlar bilan ham ulashaymi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 6 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 877,364 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dev Farhod” (@devfarhod), 301 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devfarhod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.