Channel
@deti_igraut
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
668subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001539271890 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deti_igraut |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deti_igraut |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 668 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 669 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 670 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 670 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 October 2025 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 190 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
246 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 206 | 83.7% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 5.69% | |
| 🎄 | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 3.25% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 2.44% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deti_igraut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 October 2025 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
«Дай телефон». «Можно мультики?» «Ну ещё пять минут!» Думаю даже спрашивать не нужно, это точно совшат все и может казаться, что ребёнку больше ничего не интересно. Игрушки лежат, книги не открываются, прогулка не радует, а телефон нужен сразу после пробуждения, в машине, за столом и перед сном. Но прежде чем говорить о зависимости, важно понять: зачем ребёнку экран именно сейчас? 🤔 📱 Телефон может быть не только ра…
❤4
«Я же сто раз сказала!» «Он всё прекрасно понимает, просто делает назло». «Если захочет — может». Знакомо? В такие моменты легко решить, что ребёнок специально игнорирует, проверяет границы или просто не хочет договариваться. Иногда так и есть, дети могут спорить, сопротивляться и выбирать то, что им приятнее (и это нормально!) Но очень часто за «не слушается» стоит другое, ребёнок пока не справляется с тем, что мы …
❤14
«Ты слишком строгий», «а ты всё разрешаешь»: как выйти из этого спора? 🥰 В одной семье мама может быть мягче, папа строже, а может и наоборот. Один взрослый хочет сначала выслушать ребёнка, другой считает, что правила не должны обсуждаться. И довольно быстро разговор о воспитании превращается в спор о том, кто из родителей прав. 💡Родители не обязаны одинаково реагировать на каждую ситуацию. Гораздо важнее, умеют ли…
❤8
Я не пишу посты, но через день удаляю рекламу в комментариях, вернее предложения от мошенников. Временно закрываю комментарии. И да, всё ещё надеюсь вернусь к вам с постоянными постами летом.
❤9🔥1
Я знаю, опять я выпала, но увидела у коллег и не могу не поделиться. Тема болезненная, но если об этом не говорить, то кто-то не получит помощь, а она нужна ❤️
❤8
Начну с главного: не обязательно постоянно чем-то заниматься с ребёнком. Особенно в праздники. В каникулы дети получают огромное количество впечатлений: гости, шум, подарки, поездки, смена режима. Даже если всё это приятное, для нервной системы это всё равно нагрузка. И в какой-то момент ей нужна пауза, а не ещё больше круговорота. Когда мы всё время развлекаем, предлагаем игры, зовём куда-то, стараемся провести вре…
❤16🎄3🔥2
С Новым годом, мои хорошие 🎄 До встречи в 2026! 🎄 🎄 🎄 🎄 🎄 🎄
❤14🎄5
Когда ребёнок просит дорогой подарок, родителям обычно становится не по себе. Вроде бы есть понимание, что не обязан, но при этом накрывает чувство, будто ты сейчас не справляешься. Ведь когда-то решил дать всё лучшее, то чего у тебя не было и т.д. Особенно в декабре, когда вокруг бесконечные списки желаний, распродажи, успешный успех в подведении итогов года. Поэтому я решила сегодня написать об этом, что важно пом…
❤18🔥8👍4💯1
😳 «Я хочу быть одна». Женщины приходят на консультацию и не сразу, и не у всех, но часто в процессе мы доходим до фразы, которую многие мамы боятся произнести вслух: Я хочу побыть одна. Почему? Потому что мамам начинает казаться, что это звучит эгоистично, неблагодарно, словно такое признание, признание в желании побыть одной, автоматически делает женщину плохой матерью. А в реальности, потребность в уединении, вполн…
❤17💯7🙏6
🤓 СДВГ у мальчиков и девочек, диагноз один, но разные проявления. Так клиническая картина у мальчиков и девочек может отличаться настолько, что создаётся впечатление, будто речь идёт о разных состояниях. Эти различия не только биологические, но и социальные и на данный момент от них напрямую зависит, когда ставят диагноз. ❗️По данным исследований мальчикам диагноз СДВГ ставят в среднем в 8 лет, часто уже в первые год…
❤13🔥2
(но!! Всё это чаще, но не в каждом случае, поэтому если у вас девочка с гиперактивностью это тоже может быть СДВГ) Такое смещение приводит к недооценке женского СДВГ, более позднему обращению и накоплению вторичных эмоциональных нарушений. Поздняя диагностика приводит к формированию искажённой самооценки: человек годами живёт с ощущением «со мной что-то не так», не понимая нейробиологическую природу своих трудностей.…
❤12
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deti_igraut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,204,595 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология детей и взрослых” (@deti_igraut), 668 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deti_igraut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.