Channel
@detailsbyyusova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
513subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001521075719 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @detailsbyyusova |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/detailsbyyusova |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 513 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 504 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 506 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 506 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
101 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 70.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 16.8% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5343632244772709712 | 3 | 2.97% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.98% | |
| custom 5289947275286558413 | 1 | 0.99% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.99% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Меня неистово стали раздражать рекламные баннеры WB через каждые пятьсот метров с просьбами о поддержке. Пока бренды подсчитывают убытки, ожидают компенсаций и задумались, наконец-то о рисках и собственной ответственности за своё дело, WB приглашают одних из самых дорогих российских инфлюенсеров взывать о поддержке! Поддержке от покупателей, зарплаты которых не индексируются в связи со всем происходящим, но давить на…
❤9🔥4
Даже добавлять ничего не буду, так как испытываю аналогичные чувства. Анна, человеческое и профессиональное спасибо за эти слова. https://t.me/postwintour/16565
❤7👍1🔥1
Роузи Хайтингтон-Уайтли стала героиней осеннего кампейна Ekonika. Комментарии излишни – только восхищение! Надеюсь, обойдётся без волны возмущений по аналогии прошлогодней активации с Эльзой Хоск. Хотя бы по той причине, что Роузи носит фамилию всенародно любимого «создателя мемов с цитатами из жизни» – Стетхем. UPD: бренд удалил все снимки кампейна из соцсетей. 🌟
❤10👏2🔥1
Сегодня в рамках рубрики #интервью_в_деталях хочу познакомить вас с Юлией Грона – fashion-стилистом, креативным продюсером и человеком, который делает не просто огранку стиля в кадре, а создаёт особую эстетику и философию в каждом своём проекте. Мы поговорили о личных первоисточниках и взглядах на профессию, о трансформации стиля, любимых проектах и о том, какие ситуации происходят внутри съёмочных процессов. О люб…
❤12🔥5👍2
Культ отмены рождает культ репутации? Мы живём не в самое экологичное время с точки зрения реакций, где всё озвученное публично в огранке ранжируемого контента становится достоянием и спусковым крючком для выражения восторга или публичной порки. И чаще всего происходит второе. Почему столь важно «следить за базаром» экспертам и брендам, и нужно ли это делать в моменте, если соцсети давно дали полный карт-бланш на са…
❤10🔥4👍3custom 52899472752865584131
Никто:.. Абсолютно все: новый кампейн Chloé AW’26/27! Во-первых, это чертовски красиво. Во-вторых и далее можно долго обсуждать арт-дирекшн и одну из самых ярких коллекций грядущего высокого сезона. Сегодня без философских мыслей – насматриваемся и созидаем! 🌟
❤10🔥1🤩1
Как похорошел дом Balenciaga при Пьерпаоло Пичолли. Моя очередная попытка отсмотреть показы кутюрной недели моды началась именно с этой коллекции. Не могу определиться, что же меня зацепило больше: то ли возвращение к заветам Кристобаля Баленсиага о том, что кутюрье должен быть и художником, и раскройщиком, и философом, то ли это личная вкусовщина, так как никогда не воспринимала коллекции Дэмны всерьёз и рада, что в…
❤13custom 53436322447727097123🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @detailsbyyusova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“образно в деталях” (@detailsbyyusova), 513 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/detailsbyyusova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.