Channel
@designlada
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
809subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001964374671 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @designlada |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/designlada |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 809 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 810 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 811 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 811 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
314 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5359413779979335266 | 133 | 42.4% | |
| custom 5359512452557997086 | 91 | 29.0% | |
| custom 5361990365219942503 | 79 | 25.2% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 3.50% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @designlada. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 31 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🈶🈶🈶🈶🈶 постов, которые вышли на этом канале весной Что интересного вы могли пропустить: 1️⃣Классный промпт - оформить свой профиль в любой соц.сети в стиле детского рисунка 2️⃣Сайт, на котором можно посмотреть свой цвет по дате рождения 3️⃣4 признака, что Пинтерест вам не подойдет для продвижения 4️⃣Акция на эмодзи для вашего канала
custom 535941377997933526611custom 53595124525579970867custom 53619903652199425036🕊1
Из-за расцвета ИИ совсем перестала рисовать от руки :( Тяжело признавать, что нейронкой часто действительно проще и быстрее создать любую иллюстрацию. Но я очень скучаю по самому процессу и хочу вернуть его в свою жизнь) Поэтому на май возвращаю акцию «Эмодзи-сюрприз». В прошлый раз она вам понравилась и места быстро заняли) 💡В чем суть: 1. Вы оплачиваете фиксированную стоимость 990 ₽ 2. Я смотрю ваш канал и слуша…
custom 535951245255799708625custom 535941377997933526618custom 536199036521994250318
Какие соц.сети вы сейчас ведете?
The shares total 241%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вас сейчас сильнее всего тормозит?
The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какую пользу вам было бы интересно получить именно от меня?
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Мои хорошие, нужна ваша помощь💙 Пройдите, пожалуйста, несколько опросов ниже↩ Хочу сделать новый гайд для вас, но пока сомневаюсь, что будет актуальнее всего) P.S. Старый с 50 идеями для контента еще можно забрать вот здесь P.P.S. На лайф-канале вчера делала интерактив с КПТ-картами, если интересно, вытащу карту и вам💙💙
custom 535941377997933526613🕊8custom 53595124525579970868
Смотрите, какой классный тренд - ваш аккаунт в виде рисунка🎨 Копируйте промпт: 請用蠟筆畫風格把整張圖創作成一幅圖畫。 簡化細節、使其看起來像是10歲孩子畫的。不要使用原来圖片的顏色。讓整體看起来是在一張白纸上作畫的感覺，非常可爱的感覺，可以加一些可愛的元素比如花朵、糖果、星星、雲朵等看起來很童真。 Отправляйте его в любую нейронку и прикрепите скрин своей странички (инст/пинт и т.д.) И делитесь в комментариях🩵
custom 535941377997933526625custom 536199036521994250316custom 535951245255799708614
🗂️Сайт, на котором можно посмотреть свой цвет по дате рождения 1️⃣Переходите по ссылке 2️⃣По горизонтали ищите свой месяц 3️⃣По вертикали - число рождения И делитесь в комментариях, какой цвет у вас получился и использовали бы вы его у себя в блоге, или нет) Я своим тоже поделюсь⤵️
custom 535941377997933526617custom 536199036521994250310custom 53595124525579970868
Как же я устала от этого, вы не представляете🤩🤩🤩 Устала от бесконечного копирования моего видения и идей моих любимых клиентов Собрала вам всего парочку примеров, а их уже !!сотни!! Я уже молчу про тех, кто просто скачивает пины и выкладывает под своим именем, продавая свои услуги Я понимаю, почему так происходит: мои пины круто залетают, вирусятся на миллионы, приводят подписчиков. И у людей создается ощущение,…
custom 535941377997933526617custom 536199036521994250311custom 53595124525579970869
Можно я тут побомблю? 😡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕊2custom 53594137799793352662custom 53595124525579970861
Дуров наконец-то вернул стену🙈 Если вы еще не видели, в Телеграм появилось приложение @wall По сути, это тот же самый Threads - соц.сеть для небольших сообщений, как был Twitter Если вам нравится такой формат, то попробовать обязательно стоит) 🪄 Самое классное в этом - что в самом тг нет ленты рекомендаций, а в Стене есть! И это отличный шанс найти новую аудиторию ➕Мой профиль там Не уверена, что буду туда писат…
custom 535941377997933526614custom 53619903652199425038custom 53595124525579970867
Куда делись все интересные каналы в телеграм? 😅 Многие пишут про падение охватов и количества читателей, но еще не видела, чтобы кто-то написал про то, как сильно сократилось количество постов и контента в целом. Последние дни захожу и просто не могу найти в своей ленте интересные каналы🙈 Кто-нибудь еще заметил такое? Если да, давайте исправим: 🌸Отправляйте в комментарии ссылку на свой канал и самые интересные пос…
custom 535941377997933526616custom 535951245255799708612custom 536199036521994250310
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @designlada. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие соц.сети вы сейчас ведете?
The shares total 241%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вас сейчас сильнее всего тормозит?
The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какую пользу вам было бы интересно получить именно от меня?
The shares total 188%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Можно я тут побомблю? 😡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 31 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 354,892 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лада ✧ Контент по душе” (@designlada), 809 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designlada.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.