Video message, posted without a caption
❤23❤🔥10🆒6🔥3

Channel
@design_practics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,085subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002666268767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @design_practics |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/design_practics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 1,085 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 1,081 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 1,080 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 1,080 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
168 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 67.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 26 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 7.74% | |
| 🆒 | 12 | 7.14% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.595% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤23❤🔥10🆒6🔥3
вести с летней школы: открыли выставку социального плаката!
❤14❤🔥10
Объявляем опен-колл на наш фестиваль. «точка, запятая.» 🐚 Мы приглашаем художн_иц, исследователь_ниц и независимых автор_ок, работающих с: 🕊️темами повседневности, выгорания и уязвимости 🕊️практиками глубокого внимания, совместного присутствия, медленного действия 🕊️критикой культа продуктивности и wellness-индустрии Тема фестиваля посвящёна усталости как базовому состоянию современности. Мы предлагаем взглянут…
❤15🔥7❤🔥6👎1
наши друзья объявили опен-колл на проведение прекрасных вещей в московской области!
❤3🔥2🥰2
будем рады всем!
💻 Вебинар «Социальный дизайн: история идей и практик общественных изменений» Когда мы говорим о социальном дизайне, кажется, что это новое направление, появившееся как ответ на современные кризисы. ⏸ Но многие идеи, которые сегодня обсуждаются как социальный, устойчивый или ответственный дизайн, появились задолго до нашего времени, а сами дизайнеры уже больше ста лет спорят о том, какую роль дизайн должен играть в …
❤11🆒6🔥1
что общего у гусениц, транспорта и цветов? рассказываем, как прошло воскресенье в нашем центре «соседи» к нам в гости на досуговую программу приходила волонтёрка даша, графическая дизайнерка и со-организаторка мастерской «дизайн-практик». даша предложила ребятам создать авторские рисунки для будущих наклеек. благодаря дашиному профессиональному взгляду мы уверены, что результат получится клевый и модный, и мы обяза…
❤14
проводили практику в воскресенье!
❤1
буквально последние пять часов, чтобы подать заявку на мастерскую!
❤2
последние листания в этом сезоне в эту субботу снова соберёмся, чтобы показать друг другу важные нам книги, рассказать о них и обсудить. это будут последние листания перед летним перерывом. после события команда мастерской хочет сосредоточить силы на подготовке летнешкольной мастерской, поэтому встреча станет завершающей в этом сезоне. для участия нужно лишь принести 2–3 книги и рассказать, почему они для вас важн…
❤9
делимся, как вчера прошла практика «личное+социальное» в кп «пыль»! вместе с участницами и участниками мы рефлексировали о социальном в своих жизнях, а затем создали зины, сочетая работу с типографикой и тушью. после творческой части делились итогами: кто‑то рассказал о своей собачке, взятой из приюта, кто‑то — о постоянных переездах и отсутствии ощущения «дома». ждем вас на следующих практиках — следите за анонсам…
❤22
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @design_practics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 339,852 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“мастерская дизайн-практик” (@design_practics), 1,085 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/design_practics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.