Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Wahrheitsversteher

Channel

Wahrheitsversteher

@derwahrheitsversteher

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

319subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001350004332
TypeChannel
Username@derwahrheitsversteher
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/derwahrheitsversteher

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3193233217 August 2026 — 320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320 subscribers15 August 2026 — 323 subscribers21 August 2026 — 321 subscribers4 September 2026 — 319 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 28 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 318–324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 12:00319-2
21 Aug 2026, 08:28321-2
15 Aug 2026, 01:24323+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:31320no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:19320first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 48m
Average length
14m 03s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1930.2%
👍1828.6%
🤣1015.9%
812.7%
🔥46.35%
👀23.17%
💯11.59%
🤔11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Altersprüfung im Betriebssystem: Der nächste Schritt zur digitalen Identitätskontrolle (Audio) 📢 von Dr. Peter F. Mayer Ein parteiübergreifender US-Senatsentwurf will Altersprüfungen direkt in jedes Betriebssystem einbauen, das in den Vereinigten Staaten verkauft wird. Der „Digital Age Assurance Act of 2026“ soll genau das vorschreiben. https://tkp.at/2026/08/03/alterspruefung-in-jedem-betriebssystem-der-naechste-

🔥21

3 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC142 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Es soll doch bitte niemand behaupten, dass sich nichts verändert hätte...😊

👍2🤣2

30 Jul 2026, 17:36 UTC98 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @menschenfeundPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👏3

29 Jul 2026, 23:37 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wie ich finde, eine sehr gute Frage. Die anderen Fragen, die sich daraus ergeben, sind, ob die Politiker tatsächlich das glauben oder ob sie tatsächlich nur Schauspieler sind. Also manchmal habe ich den Eindruck, sie glauben es selber, es sind dann schon sehr gute Schauspieler. Allerdings stellt sich dann unweigerlich die Frage, wer die tatsächlichen Strippenzieher sind und ob diese dann tatsächlich glauben, dass sie

1👍1

23 Jul 2026, 00:23 UTC131 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Kymatik und die Frequenz-Verschwörung Dieses Video ist eine archäologische Suche nach Fundamenten der Kymatik, die unter Schichten von Zivilisationsmüll vergraben liegen. Die oberen Schichten kennt man, tiefere Schichten wirken manchmal technisch oder mysteriös. Viel Unsinn muss erst weggeräumt werden. Doch wenn man den Dreck an den Stiefeln nicht scheut und weiter gräbt, wird das, was man findet, immer vertrauter.

👏21

22 Jul 2026, 02:17 UTC118 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

WAHRHEITSVERSTEHER - 🤡 KUNTERBUNTEBILDERSAMMLUNG 🤡 #432 - 22.07.2026 👉 https://t.me/derwahrheitsversteher 👉 https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wahrheitsversteher/

🤣2

13 Jul 2026, 16:54 UTC169 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @menschenfeundPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

👏5

9 Jul 2026, 23:00 UTC204 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏4🤔1

7 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC178 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

WAHRHEITSVERSTEHER - 🤡 KUNTERBUNTEBILDERSAMMLUNG 🤡 #431 - 08.07.2026 👉 https://t.me/derwahrheitsversteher 👉 https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wahrheitsversteher/

👍1

6 Jul 2026, 23:59 UTC176 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

💡Wir prüfen, welche Glühbirne man wirklich im Haus verwenden sollte (German Overvoice) Da nicht jeder diese Messgeräte hat, ist es meiner Meinung nach ein sehr interessanter Versuch, der ziemlich aufschlussreich ist. Was da alles noch dahintersteckt, steht natürlich auf einem ganz anderen Blatt. Welche Firmen damit richtig gut Geld verdient haben, können wir uns denken. Deswegen habe ich dieses Video für euch auf De

1

6 Jul 2026, 03:52 UTC144 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Schädlicher LED-Zwang statt gesundes natürliches Licht von Glühbirnen 💡 Ja, die guten alten Glühlampen. Wer kennt sie noch aus der früheren Zeit? Und wisst ihr noch, danach kamen dann diese Energiesparlampen, wie so kleine Neonröhren mit dem Quecksilber. Hmm, das ist bestimmt gut für die Umwelt. Und heutzutage ist sozusagen alles per EU-Zwang nur noch mit LED ausgestattet. Inzwischen ist es, ich hätte es schon fast

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @derwahrheitsversteher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Wahrheitsversteher” (@derwahrheitsversteher), 319 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/derwahrheitsversteher.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.