Channel
@dermatology_msk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
751subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001488230460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dermatology_msk |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dermatology_msk |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:56 | 751 | +6 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 745 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 743 | +5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 738 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 729 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 723 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 721 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 721 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 43.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 37.7% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Рецидивирующий невус (Recurrent nevus) - возникает при неполном удалении невуса(чаще всего по эстетическим показаниям). Клинически рецидивирующий невус представляет собой пигментированное пятно или папулу, возникающую в пределах рубца после предыдущего вмешательства. Образование часто имеет асимметричные границы, неровные контуры и неравномерную пигментацию, варьирующую от светло-коричневого до темно-коричневого или…
❤2
Гигантские врожденные меланоцитарные невусы - это редкие пигментные образования кожи, присутствующие при рождении, которые несут повышенный риск развития злокачественной меланомы и нейрокожного меланоза. Ранняя диагностика и долгосрочное последующее наблюдение имеют решающее значение для пациентов группы высокого риска. Сочетание современных методов визуализации с генетическим тестированием позволяет провести более к…
❤3🔥1
Доброе утро! ☀️ Я решила с вами поделиться интересной статьей 2026 года. Конечно, у каждого из нас при диагнозе «Гигантский врожденный меланоцитарный невус» возникает четкая связь с ребенком, но такие дети не всегда имеют меланомы на фоне этих невусов и доживают до зрелых лет. И вот я нашла статью о женщине с таким невусом, которой 55 лет!
Климат, времена года и рак кожи: 16-летнее ретроспективное исследование тенденций в Новой Зеландии. Рак кожи остается одной из наиболее значимых проблем общественного здравоохранения Новой Зеландии. Высокий уровень ультрафиолетового (УФ) излучения в сочетании с преобладанием населения со светлым фототипом кожи обусловливает одну из самых высоких в мире заболеваемостей данной патологией. Несмотря на наличие современн…
Пришел результат гистологи - «Базальноклеточный рак кожи». Как говорится: «Глаз алмаз 💎».
❤2🔥1
Всем добрый день! Напомню про этот клинический случай
❤1
Очень сложная тема. Много непонятного и неизвестного, но такие образования не редкость, а значит о них нужно говорить и их необходимо изучать! 🔬
🤔3
Posted without readable text
❤7
Вчера была у своего любимого дерматолога — Светланы Денисевич ❤️ Пришла на ежегодный осмотр родинок. Проверили всё тело с помощью дерматоскопа, удалили несколько доброкачественных образований (кератомы), а одну новую родинку, которая врачу не понравилась, удалили и отправили на гистологическое исследование. И знаете что? Я вообще ничего не почувствовала. Если честно, переживала гораздо больше, чем это того стоило. …
❤2🙏2
Удаление внутридермального невуса в эстетических целях часто сопряжено с отеком на фоне инфильтрационной анестезией. В течение 30 - 60 минут отек спадает.
❤5
Фотография в UV-режиме перед панч-биопсией
❤1
ВОПРОС: может ли за несколько месяцев появиться базалиома ? Вполне себе, таких кейсов у нас предостаточно! Но в этом случае ожидаем результат гистологии, вдруг, я ошибаюсь)
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dermatology_msk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кожу не обманешь | Денисевич С.С.” (@dermatology_msk), 751 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dermatology_msk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.