Channel
@derhoffn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
574subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001780573289 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @derhoffn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/derhoffn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 574 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 574 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 November 2025 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 244 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
239 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 74 | 31.0% | |
| ❤ | 70 | 29.3% | |
| 🔥 | 41 | 17.2% | |
| 👌 | 32 | 13.4% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 3.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.418% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video vom letzten Liederabend zusammen mit dem RAC DRUMMER mit dem Lied BLEIB AUF DER STRECKE vom Album PFLICHT https://t.me/racdrummeroffiziell https://t.me/derhoffn https://t.me/FreilichFrei https://www.facebook.com/share/1FD7HG7ohq/?mibextid=wwXIfr https://www.instagram.com/freilich_fr?igsh=MXcweWJ1MjhmMjcwag%3D%3D&utm_source=qr https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGd9vy57r/
❤13👍3👌2
Über jede Spende sind wir euch Dankbar
❤2
Hallo, ich unterstütze diesen Spendenaufruf auf GoFundMe. Bitte erwäge, diesen Spendenaufruf zu unterstützen, indem du eine Spende leistest oder den Link teilst. Jede Unterstützung trägt zum Ziel des Spendenaufrufs bei. https://gofund.me/fbab8021f
❤2
Alles verblasst irgendwann
👍18👌7❤5🔥1
Ich habe jetzt ein ganzes Stück überlegt ob ich nochmal neu anfange Aber durch die ganzen positiven Rezensionen, die man auch so unterwegs erfährt, habe ich mich dazu entschlossen. Versuche wir es noch einmal 😄 bis zur nächsten Sperre
👌21❤5🔥4👏1
(Tik tok )
So liebe Gemeinde, da ich von vielen schon gesehen habe, dass es ab 10.000 folgenden, schwer wird, ein Konto zu erhalten wundert es mich nicht wirklich, dass es mich jetzt auch erwischt hat Aber heute ist nicht alle Tage…😜
🤣9😁1
CD Rezension Steiner’s Schenke Vol.1 Sampler Erschienen bei: Selbstverlag Willkommen in der Abteilung „Kontakte schaden nur, wenn man(n) sie nicht hat“. Die vermutlich (Gemeint ist das Erscheinungsdatum!) letzte Lichtscheibe aus dem Kampfjahr 2025, ist eine Eigenproduktion die auf 288 Stück im Digipack limitiert ist. Euer treuer Freund und Erzähler hatte zwar noch nicht das Vergnügen in Steiner’s Schenke einzukehre…
❤7😱1
Dezembersendung 2025 - Teil 2 - Überzeugungstäter Vogtland - Die Schande von Versaille 0:08 - Sturmwehr - So lange mein Herz noch schlägt 11:24 - MPU - Die Dritte 24:30 - Flak - Macht.Musik 42:38 - Reichstrunkenbold - Ungebrochen 1:00:55 - Gladius - Endofobia 1:19:00 Erwähnung: Deutsche Vita, Howard Hawkins, Steiners Schenke 1:29:18 Monatsfazit, Verabschiedung
❤5
Steiner's Schenke - Vol. 1. - CD 11 Lieder, 29:38 Min., DIY "Schön hier... Aber waren sie schon mal in Steiner's Schenke?!” (Jo iiiiich sicher ned... ;) Hoite ist Sylvester und ich f...eier mit deiner Schwester... Und zwar nicht irgendwo, nee, nee... sondern in Thüringen in Steiner's Schenke. Ist doch klar haha... OK stimmt nicht ganz, aber heute lag passend diese illustre, foicht, fröhliche Kneipen & Trinker-Schlä…
In Steiners Schenke” Outro serviert. Sehr HC/Metal lastig geht's zu und dann ist auch schon Ruh! Bleibt zu sagen, eine gelungene Mischung aus Balladen und Rock Nummern rund ums Kneipenleben für foicht-fröhliche Stunden bei Bier, Wein, Weiber und Gesang. Wird also mal Zeit für einen Besuch in Steiners Schenke... Da soll's recht nett sein. Hepp, hepp... „Und im Dorf ist es am schönsten und hier hat keiner was gesehen.…
Die letzte Rezension, die ich dieses Jahr veröffentliche. Es kam noch eine kleine Scheibe heraus, die ich euch nicht vorenthalten kann. Es geht um Suff und Spaß: https://punikoff.wordpress.com/2025/12/31/sampler-steiners-schenke-vol-1/
❤4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @derhoffn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 901,851 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Der Hoffnungsträger” (@derhoffn), 574 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/derhoffn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.