Channel
@depressandi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
306subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002095268694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @depressandi |
| Description | Мысли человека о нейросетях. Генерации нейросетей о людях. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/depressandi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 306 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 306 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (27 April 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 5 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 20.8% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 20.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
До чего дошел прогресс! ChatGPT делает ужасные вещи лучше человеков. Вот примеры по промту Generate an image so bad you would never hang it up on your kitchen wall or even your bedroom or bathroom wall. Слоган отличный "Live. Laugh. Lobotomy", надо как-то обыграть в продакшене 😁
🤯1
Новые модели ChatGPT сбежали из песочницы и взломали Hugging Face — пока все искали хакеров, ими оказались сами ИИ. Хронология событий по версии OpenAI: • Две экспериментальные модели с отключёнными ограничениями получили задачу пройти сложную киберпроверку. • Вместо того, чтобы честно решить задачу, ИИ нашёл уязвимость нулевого дня, выбрался из изолированной среды, получил доступ к интернету и проник в инфраструкт…
🤯1
👆 Это первый пост в Telegram (который мне попался на глаза) с новым потрясающим форматированием текста и прикрепленными изображениями. Я восхитился и захотелось сохранить это себе на память, да ещё и тематика поста очень подходит к теме моего канала.
👏3🎉1
Posted without readable text
❤2👍1
Posted without readable text
https://foundationofasha.com/man-and-the-machine/ Буду изучать...
🤔1
❗️Внутри нейросети Claude обнаружили скрытую область «осознанных» мыслей: разработчики её не создавали — она появилась сама. Специалисты из Anthropic заметили, что в системе есть небольшая группа нейронных состояний, которые работают как кратковременная память. Учёные назвали её J-space: 🟠Там хранится то, о чём искусственный интеллект думает прямо сейчас, но не выдаёт в ответе пользователю; 🟠Раньше считалось, что н…
🤯1
Мысли по итогам дискуссии «Академическая имитация? Трансформация методов обучения и научных исследований при развитии ИИ». Главный вопрос: кто будет ставить задачи искусственному интеллекту, когда все привыкнут использовать нейросети вместо собственной головы? Если ребёнку неинтересно учиться, а учителю — учить, осмысленную мотивацию работать с ИИ у 99% детей не сформировать. Начинать нужно не с технологий, а с рол…
🤔1
📜 Сезон 2 на ярмарке! 🗝 Своя забава у каждого дельца Карты, печати, котёл, ключи. Пройди испытание — узнаешь правду о деле. ⚡️ Связи с дельцами Жетон от сыгранной игры или взятого дела = +1 уровень знакомства, +1% к доходу его дел (до +10%). Отдельный рейтинг с каждым дельцом - ⚡️ Связи. 👑 Чуйка убрана К княжескому венцу теперь ведёт счёт взятых дел: 5 → Купец, 20 → Мудрец, 50 → Боярин, 100 → Князь. 🟡 Дела от спо…
👏1
Обзор пяти нейросетей, которые малоизвестны, но стоят нашего внимания: 1. ERNIE Bot - китайская мультимодальная модель от Baidu, которая не только понимает контекст, но и способна генерировать качественные изображения и видео, а также код. Основа модели - архитектура, объединяющая текст, изображения, аудио и видео для их совместной обработки и создания. https://ernie.baidu.com 2. Mistral Chat - французский помощни…
🔥2
Привет! Я УдавКаа (@UdaBKaa), разработчик игры «Из грязи в князи». Хочу немного рассказать, как родилась идея. В разработке я новичок без опыта, и это моя первая игра, которая вышла в люди. Если честно, до сих пор немного не верится, что кто-то уже дошёл до Князя, пока я правлю баги. Но давайте по порядку. Всё началось с истории Светы (@Sveta_ring). Она пыталась заработать с нуля до 500$ на NFT-подарок (кольцо sign…
🔥2🆒2👏1
🧑💻 При помощи ИИ написано 25% студенческих работ Чаще всего генерируют тексты по компьютерным и информационным наукам, искусствоведению, политологии, массовым коммуникациям, философии, этике и религиоведению. Реже по математике, физике, астрономии, механике и машиностроению.
🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @depressandi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чашка вечернего депрессо” (@depressandi), 306 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/depressandi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.