Channel
@depecheprod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002729176617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @depecheprod |
| Description | Хард сайенс продуктового менеджмента |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/depecheprod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 91 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 91 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (21 October 2025 – 14 July 2026) |
| Views total | 181 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
102 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 82.4% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 9.80% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 7.84% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Немного про контрольные карты Если не чинить то, что сломано — это очевидно плохо, то еще хуже чинить то, что не сломано. Понять когда метрика действительно изменилась — не всегда тривиальная задача. В процесс вмешивается естественная вариативность метрики, неконтролируемые условия, сезонность. И первое, что приходит на ум — это построить доверительный интервал. Это хорошая практика про которую многие забывают: без…
❤10
Совершенно случайно обнаружил, что моя книжная полка сама по себе создала ребус. Попробуйте отгадать, какая управленческая максима зашифрована на картинке
❤3🌚1🤡1
🤡
Математики 1 апреля #математика #юмор
🤡7❤2🌚1
Из мухи слона: инкрементальность в продуктовой разработке Я думаю, что все, кто знаком с гибкими методологиями разработки, видели картинку, на которой сперва у вас скейтборд, затем самокат, велосипед и далее — автомобиль. Эта метафора инкрементальности оказалась потрясающе популярной и понятной, и как часто бывает с популярными и понятными вещами: также совершенно неправильной. Инкрементальный подход позволяет не з…
❤7🤡2🌚1
Первая картинка — типичные пространственные отклонения, которые мы замечаем. Вторая картинка — показывает чем острота зрения отличается от пространственной остроты: грубо говоря, чтобы явно различить две точки (а не увидеть одну вытянутую), они должны быть разделены некоторым расстроянием (на картинке — это одна гексагональная клетка) Но чтобы увидеть что одна точка находится выше другой, расстояние может быть значит…
❤3
Почему интерфейс приложения выглядит неаккуратно и при чем тут миллениалы и штангенциркуль? Этот пост — реакция на дискуссию, которая произошла у меня на работе по поводу обоснованности pixel-perfect верстки и на мем, который я увидел в другом уважаемом канале. Острота чувств определяется тем, насколько маленькие детали мы можем различить. Например, коль скоро мы говорим про визуальную составляющую приложения, остр…
❤8
Сколько я не вычитывал текст, все же, в него закралась ошибка: в паре мест я перепутал независимые и зависимые переменные, текст уже скорректировал, однако приношу извинения, если кого-то запутал
🌚3❤1
Представьте, что есть дерево метрик от метрики A до метрики M, рассмотрим пограничные значения: Левый верхний квадрант: предсказанная А при изменении метрики B — точки настоящих значений A находятся очень близко к прямой (предсказанная A), низкий уровень дисперсии, высокая надежность предсказания Нижний правый квадрант: предсказанная A при изменении метрики M — точки реальных значений A находятся едва ли не по всей…
❤4
Построить unit-экономику, вырастить ретеншн и посадить дерево метрик У всех бывает, но не у всех проходит. Любой продакт использовал RICE, любой пытался переписывать требования в формате Job Stories, и уж наверняка, мучал своих пользователей «проблемными» или «решенческими» интервью, иногда совмещая оба подхода сразу! В списке продуктовых клише особняком стоит любовь к построению деревьев метрик. Дерево метрик — эт…
❤5
Enshitification и пограничные пользователи продукта У BMW есть интересная технология лазерных фар – Laser Light. Идея лазерных источников света не нова, но из-за дороговизны, эта технология крайне редко добираются до пользователей. Энтузиасты были в восторге от этих фар: иметь в своей машине не простую фару, а уникальный оптический прибор с высокой эффективностью — это роскошь. Однако, год назад, BMW прекратили их п…
❤9
Из всех вин, самое пьянящее на свете – инференционная статистика В предыдущем посте я писал о том, что p-value – это градиент убедительности доказательств против нулевой гипотезы. Его величина прямо коррелирует с байесовской эмпирической вероятностью того, что нулевая гипотеза верна – грубо говоря, чем меньше p-value, тем мы уверенне в том, что A на самом деле лучше B. В этом посте я расскажу про три способа примене…
❤5🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @depecheprod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 524,941 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Depeche Prod” (@depecheprod), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/depecheprod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.