Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Здравый смысл Дени

@denyadumaet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001943085876
TypeChannel
Username@denyadumaet
DescriptionПишу о • Дизайне • Людях • Продуктах • Жизни • хуенно Личка, дабы поболтать: @denyalykin 🔞
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/denyadumaet

Growth

1197 August 2026 — 119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 119 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118–120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 04:17119no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:28119first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.1%
avg views ÷ 119 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (26 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total343
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 04:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
240
Videos
11
Links
63

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10364.4%
🎉1610.0%
🥰159.38%
custom 5426977274857553589106.25%
42.50%
😱31.88%
🤣31.88%
custom 542910263083403803721.25%
🤔21.25%
🌚10.625%
🤝10.625%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC120 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤔🤔🤔 У психолога должен быть психолог У тренера — тренер, а у дизайнера — дизайнер. Ну, окей, наставник. Въезжаю в сложнейший для меня курс про карьеру продуктового дизайнера у Мари t.me/design_awesome. Почему сложнейший? Потому что за время, пока я работал, болел и лечился, преподавал и восстанавливался — рынок изменился. И теперь надо научиться заново в нём жить. Удачи мне, принесу много крутого. 3️⃣3️⃣7️⃣ 😎

🎉16🥰6

3 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC136 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🆒🆒🆒🆒 Сегодня Апофени́я Дурацкое слово, хотя абсолютно законное, с древнегреческого его можно буквально перевести как «высказывание суждения» или «делать что-либо явным». Апофения — это склонность нашего мозга видеть связи там, где их нет. Мем «Дратути» с мордой собаки, читающейся в срубе деревянной доски — это самый явный пример апофении. Наш мозг склонен соединять разрозненные сущности в единую систему. Так, на

10🤝1

29 Jun 2026, 21:04 UTC116 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

🛠🛠🛠 Поковырял Figma Motion Посидел часик с новым инструментом — ну что сказать, типичный кейфрейм редактор анимации. Всё достаточно очевидно и понятно, если хоть раз работал с ключами, таймлайном и изменениями значений. Само собой, всё заточено под интерфейсы — менять позицию, размер, угол, цвет и всё остальное надо уметь так, чтобы делать крутые микроинтеракшены. На гифке видно, что аниматить можно от простого к

62

27 Jun 2026, 12:11 UTC87 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤔🤔🤔 Первый мой семестр в ITHub закончился И закончился на очень яркой ноте. Абсолютно великолепная команда истинных наставников, невероятные студенты, потрясающая атмосфера — всё тут. Преподавал я впервые после второго курса универа — в качестве летней практике на кафедре вёл информатику у первого курса. С тех пор как-то пошло поехало: ко мне часто стали приходить за консультацией, на первом месте работы проводил

9🥰9custom 54269772748575535894custom 54291026308340380372

21 Jun 2026, 18:16 UTC116 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 Меня покорил Нео Деко Я не разбираюсь в архитектуре и дизайне интерьеров. У меня плохо получается моделировать пространство в комнатах, я понимаю, что этому нужно учиться (долго и упорно, как и чему угодно более-менее серьезному, привет курсам «стань промпт-инженером за месяц»). Но я четко знаю две важных вещи: 1. Что мне нравится, 2. Что мне не нравится. Мне нравится квартира Леонарда и Шелдона из «ТБВ», нра

122

12 Jun 2026, 10:42 UTC141 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎛🎛🎛🎛 Мне нравится у Эльбы всё В силу своей ИП-шности я пользуюсь «Контур.Эльбой». Это такая бухгалтерия электронная, которая за меня считает всю эту ужасную бухгалтерскую чепуху, автоматизирует процессы по декларациям и в целом упрощает жизнь. И мне очень нравится всё, что у них смотрит на пользователя. В том плане, что прям вообще всё: от кнопок до тон-оф-войса. Вот например экранчик задач на будущее. Можно был

11

4 Jun 2026, 08:41 UTC140 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🌐🌐🌐 Каждые 10 постов выкладываю навигацию по ним. Предыдущий пост-оглавление №321 🤔🤔🤔 ✦ Хочу уметь рисовать ✦ Лекция Ильи про брейкпоинты 🧑‍💻🧑‍💻🧑‍💻 Радость от легкой верстки 🥹🥹🥹🥹 ✦ Чтобы разблокировать кассу ✦ Ответить + понос ⚜️⚜️⚜️ ✦ Новый бренд Амазонии ✦ Тредс сменил лого 🛠🛠🛠 ✦ Стэк нейронок на мой каждый день ✦ Фигма купила Вив ✦ Ростелеком сделал «Спектр» ✦ Тильда мертва 3⃣3️⃣1️⃣ 😎 #навигация@denyadum

custom 542697727485755358965

1 Jun 2026, 19:50 UTC137 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤔🤔🤔 Сегодня посмотрел выступление Бирмана про то, что брейкпоинты не нужны Приятная лекция в стиле Ильи, где он говорит простые вещи, о которых многие забыли — думайте как дизайнеры, творите, а не шаблонизируйте. Да, он своеобразно высказывает мысль («хочу загасить саму идею брейкпоинтов»), но если вслушиваться в слова и мысль, то там всё понятно и ничего ужасного в его словах нет. Больше любопытна реакция из зала

6🤔2

31 May 2026, 09:46 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vladzelyzip

Output isn’t design Design keeps being misunderstood in our industry. New tools keep promising to generate interfaces faster, move words to product instantly, or collapse design directly into code. The assumption behind them is clear: that design is the act of producing. That is the misunderstanding. The hard part of design is rarely generating the form. It is understanding the problem well enough to know what and

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @denyadumaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Здравый смысл Дени” (@denyadumaet), 119 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denyadumaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.