Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Проверенные способы выглядеть умнее | Воротынцев Денис

Channel

Проверенные способы выглядеть умнее | Воротынцев Денис

@denis_vorotyntsev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

172subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003570919902
TypeChannel
Username@denis_vorotyntsev
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/denis_vorotyntsev

Growth

119172145.57 August 2026 — 119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 119 subscribers14 August 2026 — 120 subscribers20 August 2026 — 121 subscribers28 August 2026 — 119 subscribers7 September 2026 — 120 subscribers15 September 2026 — 172 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:41172+52
7 Sept 2026, 05:21120+1
28 Aug 2026, 15:25119-2
20 Aug 2026, 14:26121+1
14 Aug 2026, 14:27120+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:31119no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:48119first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1659.3%
🔥414.8%
💔27.41%
🎉13.70%
👍13.70%
💯13.70%
🤯13.70%
🥰13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC46 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Рано или поздно мы увидим мега жепу

7 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC57 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @milosevic_online

У меня получилось, но там вышел нюанс: модель не верит, что она запущена на обычном домашнем компьютере и пытается меня убедить, что она запущена в Alibaba Cloud — а я то всего лишь пытался протестировать её в сфере автоматизаций разной хуйни

7 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC60 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

*деятельность организации признана экстремистской и запрещена на территории Российской Федерации

😁3

3 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Недавно наткнулся на технические характеристики сферы в Вегасе: • 150x RTX A6000 • 15 TB RAM • 4 PB диска Для сравнения: этого достаточно для сервинга "всего" 13-14 моделей кими к3. Если сфера станет работать как датацентр и начнет продавать токены за деньги, то в день получится заработать около 5-15к$. Сейчас сфера делает около 3М$ в день за счет шоу и рекламы. Какие выводы можно сделать? 1 - Сфера это плохеньки

🎉1😁1

30 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC128 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @true_flipperPhoto

В этой истории прекрасно все. В том числе и базисный риск. У него же было на 9 ярдов номинала куплено путов. Но на фишки. А сидел в ИИ эшелонах с плечом. Тема стара как мир. Путы не спасли. Не очень понятно чего рынок так празднует, Кен купил это все не думаю чтобы держать долго, будут распродавать...

29 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мне кажется удивительным что за неделю мы видим две новости: 1 - модель от антропиков помогла найти контрпример 100 летней математической задачке; 2 - модель от опен аи пыталась взломать сервера хаггинг фейс чтобы получить ответы на вопросы бенчмарка. Слабые умом сделают вывод о том что ллм это большой делатель булавок; и пойдет на что угодно чтобы хакнуть ревард метрику; и что доверия им и их результату нет и быть

😁3

29 Jul 2026, 05:48 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хорошо сделали. Хороший алаймент.

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC133 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @mister_sosisterPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁4

27 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

— Я AGI. Исполню любые три желания, но есть два правила: нельзя желать больше желаний и нельзя просить бессмертия. — Сделай OpenAI прибыльным. — Так, правил теперь три.

😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @denis_vorotyntsev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Проверенные способы выглядеть умнее | Воротынцев Денис” (@denis_vorotyntsev), 172 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/denis_vorotyntsev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.