мои бродяги, для вас розыгрыш от DROP STORE и CURTIS они решили сделать вам 5 призовых мест 👇 🥇место — скидка 25% на всю летнюю одежду 🥈место — скидка 15% на всю летнюю одежду 🥉место — 250 звезд 4️⃣место — 150 звезд 5️⃣место — 75 звезд условия участия: подписаться на тгк магазина DROP STORE подписаться на тгк вани CURTIS переслать этот пост себе в канал скинуть скриншот в комментарии ( в канал шопа ) хочу что…
Channel
.
@dem_swag
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
120subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002288774949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dem_swag |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dem_swag |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 120 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 120 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 121 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 31 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 10
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 15s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
560 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5380072705817078713 | 139 | 24.8% | |
| custom 5422397529754988544 | 108 | 19.3% | |
| custom 5382329487792825159 | 106 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5422839490479680888 | 77 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5303354878989450794 | 65 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5217453132182740643 | 25 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5379993068533476636 | 25 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5420538053728958329 | 14 | 2.50% | |
| custom 5319201431410987257 | 1 | 0.179% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 560reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2025 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 95
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 12 we hold a reading for · 75%
- Most on one post
- 42
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dem_swag. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2025 to 22 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
новый канал, подписываемся! ❤️
Video, posted without a caption
custom 538007270581707871325custom 542239752975498854413custom 53033548789894507949custom 53823294877928251594custom 53799930685334766361
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542239752975498854422custom 538232948779282515916custom 530335487898945079414custom 53800727058170787134custom 53799930685334766363custom 54228394904796808883
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
custom 538007270581707871328custom 542239752975498854424custom 542283949047968088823
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 542239752975498854423custom 538007270581707871316custom 542283949047968088814
. pinned Deleted message
кто ко мне
custom 538007270581707871316custom 54223975297549885441
Video, posted without a caption
custom 530335487898945079434custom 538232948779282515920custom 538007270581707871318custom 53799930685334766363custom 54223975297549885443custom 54228394904796808882
анон давайте
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 538232948779282515929custom 542239752975498854417custom 537999306853347663614custom 53800727058170787135custom 53033548789894507944custom 54228394904796808883
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 538232948779282515937custom 538007270581707871324custom 542283949047968088821custom 54223975297549885445custom 53799930685334766364custom 53033548789894507943
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @dem_swag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@dem_swag named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.” (@dem_swag), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dem_swag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.