Channel
@delveschool
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
517subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002319640495 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @delveschool |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delveschool |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 517 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 509 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 509 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (6 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,259 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
117 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 59.8% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 17.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 16.2% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 4.27% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
рады объявить, что в debut issue of the Delve Women in Science (DWIS) Journal подало заявку 87 человек 🤍 в их число вошли: - школьники - undergrads - masters - phds из 8 стран все заявки будут рассмотрены в течение следующей недели (3-9 августа) все аппликанты получат письмо/сообщение с результатами отбора stay tuned ☕️ - Delve team
❤17
напоминаем, что сегодня последний день, когда можно подать заявку в DWIS - Delve team
❤7🔥1
we've already hit 500 of you 🤍 the Delve team is incredibly happy to have been able to support and motivate you along the way 🦢 ———————————————- just a reminder: the DWIS application deadline is July 31 - which means only 2 days left! make sure to submit your application in time ☕️ link: click p.s. we'll soon be sharing some new initiatives - just as exciting, if not more :) stay tuned, ~ Delve
❤5🔥2
We are launching a long-term project in Rise&Delve приглашаем веб-программистов around the world присоединиться к нашей инициативе мы предлагаем: — letter of acknowledgment сразу в 2 проектах — поддержка и коррекция работы на протяжении создании платформы — со-авторство создания и признание вашего вклада — приглашение для работы над updates/ новыми запусками это уникальная возможность поработать вместе с самыми та…
🔥4❤2
just a quick reminder there’s only one week left to submit your application
❤6❤🔥3
What about your areas of interest? 🚀
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Guys from Kazakhstan (not Astana/Almaty)
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
❤🔥3
Hey, guys! We are working on our new initiatives and wanted to inquire where you are from ;)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥3❤1
до конца подачи заявок остается две недели —————————————————- only two weeks left to submit your application
❤5🔥2❤🔥1
Hey, Delve! 2,500 km and I finally met @tgzhik, our best creative manager 🥹💕 Hope to see you guys! 📍Astana, Kazakhstan, 2026 P.S. надо теперь встретиться с @Christmasvibes_girl
❤🔥8🔥3❤2
с радостью представляем вам Khushi Shah - одну из новых партнеров Delve Women in Science - founder and CEO at 14 - collabs with Google, NASA, Amazon etc - TEDx - northeastern class of 2027 до дедлайна остается 18 дней ссылка: тык
❤6🔥3🥰2❤🔥1
confirmed partnerships for the DWIS’ debut issue 1. Katya Ivshina Princeton (undergrad), Apple Intern, Harvard (PhD -> Masters) 2. Anna Wadhwa Masters + PhD at Harvard Med + MIT -> aerospace medicine 3. Sasha Mintz USC (PhD in physics) со всеми девушками сотрудничество будет проходить в форме interview для журнала + рассказа о своем опыте, ресерчах и карьерные советы на данный момент ведутся и другие переговоры …
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @delveschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What about your areas of interest? 🚀
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Guys from Kazakhstan (not Astana/Almaty)
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Hey, guys! We are working on our new initiatives and wanted to inquire where you are from ;)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
рассказываем поподробнее про confirmed partnerships?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
как вам инициатива?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 381,307 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Delve” (@delveschool), 517 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delveschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.