Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Делай • пирсинг • Казань

Channel

Делай • пирсинг • Казань

@delayystudio_public

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

843subscribers

+52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002145687378
TypeChannel
Username@delayystudio_public
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/delayystudio_public

Growth

7918438177 August 2026 — 791 subscribers8 August 2026 — 791 subscribers14 August 2026 — 835 subscribers20 August 2026 — 839 subscribers27 August 2026 — 843 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net +52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 783–851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 12:06843+4
20 Aug 2026, 23:24839+4
14 Aug 2026, 23:08835+44
8 Aug 2026, 01:46791no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:23791first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.8%
avg views ÷ 843 subscribers
Avg views / post
235
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,408
Reactions total83
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54314852897112899339657.1%
custom 54137944611529782822313.7%
custom 54295675395689848752011.9%
custom 53885869373155048551810.7%
custom 541783180772064226163.57%
custom 547207407927821621431.79%
custom 521105676194284992421.19%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC136 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подобрали в конч новое украшение от industrial strength 🥳 Все украшения от IS, кроме колечка

custom 543148528971128993316

6 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC172 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😏Миф: украшение в свежем проколе нужно постоянно прокручивать 🫢Правда: лишние движения могут раздражать канал прокола и мешать спокойному заживлению. Украшение не нужно крутить, двигать или проверять без необходимости. Чем меньше мы беспокоим свежий прокол, тем комфортнее проходит восстановление. А если кажется, что с украшением что-то не так, лучше написать мастеру и прийти на осмотр 🙏🏼

custom 541379446115297828212custom 54295675395689848754

5 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC210 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подборка необычных проколов для вдохновения 🤩

custom 543148528971128993315

4 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC244 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прокол пина, который вызвал вау эффект в наших рилс 🥰 Напоминаем, что много украшений в нашей студии в единственном экземпляре, поэтому если что-то видите в каталоге и хотите себе, не затягивайте 🤔

custom 543148528971128993322

3 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC338 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53885869373155048555

1 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC308 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Почему оригинальное украшение невозможно перепутать с копией? На первый взгляд украшения могут выглядеть одинаково, но… В оригинале: 💛 Идеальная огранка камней — больше блеска и игры света. 💛 Надежная закрепка — камень не расшатается со временем. 💛 Безупречная полировка — гладкая поверхность, которая комфортна для прокола. Разница между оригиналом и копией — это десятки мелочей, которые влияют на внешний вид, комф

custom 54314852897112899339

28 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC399 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Свежий прокол конч от главного мастера Полины 😘

custom 543148528971128993316

27 Jul 2026, 15:34 UTC394 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отзывы о старшем мастере Насте 🥰

custom 54178318077206422616custom 52110567619428499242custom 53885869373155048552custom 54314852897112899331

25 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC390 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤪 Миф: «После пирсинга можно сразу купаться в бассейне или море.» 🤫 Правда: В первое время нужно избегать бассейнов, саун и открытых водоёмов. Они повышают риск раздражения и попадания инфекции. Поэтому если планируете в отпуск, прокол лучше отложить

custom 541379446115297828211custom 54295675395689848752

24 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC420 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

К нам пришла девушка с неправильно выполненным проколом хеликса — прокол под заметным углом. К сожалению, в таких ситуациях вариантов немного. Если прокол изначально сделан неправильно, чаще всего его приходится снимать, заживлять и переделывать заново. Но в данном случае нам удалось найти решение: мы подобрали украшение и установили его так, чтобы визуально скрыть неровность прокола. Теперь композиция выглядит акк

custom 542956753956898487511custom 53885869373155048557custom 54720740792782162143

23 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC384 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цвет настроения - красный ❤️

custom 543148528971128993317custom 53885869373155048554custom 54295675395689848753

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @delayystudio_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 360,637 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Делай • пирсинг • Казань” (@delayystudio_public), 843 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delayystudio_public.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.