Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

рест || декл^^

@dekllhe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003015473288
TypeChannel
Username@dekllhe
Descriptioninfo - @infodekl связь - @deklll_bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dekllhe

Growth

2912 Aug 2026, 13:19 — 29 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:31 — 29 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 13:1912 Aug 2026, 13:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:3129no change
12 Aug 2026, 13:1929first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 8 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54338510006476192381918.3%
custom 54335951838055381261716.3%
custom 54337441719260692431312.5%
custom 54336651660026561631211.5%
custom 54340813139739001001211.5%
custom 543636242693939191087.69%
custom 526734215373812037765.77%
custom 543386110670566734054.81%
custom 526710218532536001343.85%
custom 526719599170607270543.85%
custom 526485553517746791910.962%
custom 526718344610660215810.962%
custom 526744366958513194010.962%
custom 543414120729284171010.962%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 25 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dekllhe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2026 to 25 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Feb 2026, 13:55 UTC81 viewsread 12 August 2026

привет, нет времени, где-то на недельку, я ебусь с математикой sorry не трогайте в чистках молю ес че существкет приват

24 Feb 2026, 14:37 UTC82 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩 YouTube 🤩 ## 4O ## 20 девушек VS BABY MELO и HOOD RICH LUKA ⭐️⭐️ [1:1] , DL<3 #STICKS — #BABYMELO

custom 54335951838055381265custom 54336651660026561632custom 54337441719260692432custom 54338510006476192382

19 Feb 2026, 07:30 UTC142 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩 Twitch 🤩 ## 3O ## БЕЗУМНЫЙ КАТОК С @.lenyapudge и @.ug404connect и маманя 🤩🤩 [1:1] , DL<3 #STICKS — #BEBRINA #UG404

custom 54363624269393919106custom 54337441719260692434custom 54340813139739001003custom 54338611067056673402custom 54335951838055381261custom 54338510006476192381

14 Feb 2026, 09:48 UTC404 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤩Random 🤩 ## 3O ## TeleGram , Pinterest سخيف في !¡ 👍👍 [1:1] , DL<3 #STICKS — #FREAKPARTY #LIFAR

custom 54335951838055381266custom 54338510006476192385custom 54336651660026561634custom 54338611067056673402custom 54337441719260692431custom 54340813139739001001custom 54341412072928417101custom 54363624269393919101

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dekllhe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 830,560 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“рест || декл^^” (@dekllhe), 29 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dekllhe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.