Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мюсли Дейской

@deiski_craft

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001353898050
TypeChannel
Username@deiski_craft
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deiski_craft

Growth

131132131.57 August 2026 — 131 subscribers9 August 2026 — 131 subscribers14 August 2026 — 132 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:14132+1
9 Aug 2026, 00:46131no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:03131first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.7%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held10 (14 July 202624 July 2026)
Views total755
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54000008429693966656830.6%
❤‍🔥5725.7%
2410.8%
🎉188.11%
custom 5242205960717481143177.66%
🔥156.76%
custom 533464733639823256562.70%
🤩52.25%
😨41.80%
🐳20.901%
👏20.901%
😭20.901%
🤗20.901%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 10 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deiski_craft. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 24 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC104 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Пользуясь поводом, очередной анонс на это лето. Еду разглядывать фиолетовые вайбы на Fuji Fest. #фестивальное

custom 54000008429693966659🔥5👏2custom 52422059607174811431

24 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC100 views25 reactions2 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩Только поглядите, какую красоту мне наснимали!🤩 • Откисла от поездки и потихоньку готовлюсь к следующим забегам. В этом сезоне этот несчастный костюм и в хвост и в гриву, а он ничего, держится. • Про ВК фест особо добавлять нечего. Четвёртый год набегаю и четвёртый год здорово. Да, рассадник цивилов, но косплеерское микросообщество всё ещё лучшее и делает ВК особенно классным. Было жарко, но вентилятор, галлон вод

13custom 54000008429693966656custom 52422059607174811433🔥2❤‍🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC131 views36 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ваа, это чего такое, это второе место на ВК? Кажется, да. Оно!

🎉18❤‍🔥13custom 54000008429693966655

19 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC123 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тут могла быть ваша реклама, но пока спонсор моего выживания вот эта ✨водичЬка✨. Вылакала уже литров десять наверное. Вся жизнь на ней держится. Научил ли меня этот фест не подавать меха на летние фесты? Ахаха. Нет.

custom 540000084296939666510❤‍🔥5🤩5custom 52422059607174811433

18 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC105 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Каким-то чудом пробралась в финал. Вроде бы и "одуреть! финал!", а с другой стороны, пока все будут выносить прикольный лут, я снова буду в погоне от солнечного удара. Но всё равно, преятненько. Вот вам классная Трейсер. Ради неё пришлось побегать, но оно того стоило. Жаль имя не спросила.(

11❤‍🔥4custom 54000008429693966654🤗2

18 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC99 views27 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тепловой удар ловил меня, но я быстрее. Не поймал *^*

❤‍🔥11custom 54000008429693966658custom 52422059607174811435🐳2custom 53346473363982325651

18 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC93 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А лучшего способа транспортировки у меня на сегодня нет. Тык-мык поволоклась к месту. Не упекусь - будет здорово.-. #фестивальное

custom 540000084296939666513❤‍🔥5custom 52422059607174811432

15 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTC≈1,260 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📸В объектив красивое попалось. • Решила, что пора потихоньку выпускать свои работы из стола. Так что официально заявляю: вышла на охоту за прекрасными кадрами и начала фотографировать потрясающих барышень в косплее. • Снова напоминаю, что у вас есть отличный шанс заставить меня валяться у вас в ногах. С камерой, но валяться. • Снимаю на исходники. Лёгкую ретушь накидать могу. • Также выезжаю как бэкстейдж фотограф

❤‍🔥9custom 54000008429693966659🔥8

14 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC124 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

По поводу куска сверху - это буквально самое зловредное моё творение. На этапе изготовления: ✨Полегло два принтера. Наглухо. ✨ В ближайших городах закончились нитки, которыми все расшивается. Последние мотки вынесла. ✨ В РФ закончилась как класс очень нужная краска. ✨ Дважды навернулся гравер. ✨ Никак не согласуются этапы с людьми, на которых повязаны важные моментики. ✨ Закончилась вся ева, а при заказе прислали не

😨4custom 52422059607174811433😭2

14 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC115 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я сейчас на вайбах рассеянной свинухи, которая никогда не видела неба. Вроде чето постоянно делаю, а конца не видно. Зато на вк в конкурс опять пробралась, даже уже вещички пакую к своему третьему блоку. Параллельно ковыряю свою огромную проблему, которая никак не хочет собраться в кучу. Кусочек проблемы. Висит, ждёт, когда голимый мех заменю на подобие горностая.

❤‍🔥9custom 53346473363982325655custom 54000008429693966654

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @deiski_craft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 192,066 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мюсли Дейской” (@deiski_craft), 132 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deiski_craft.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.