Channel
@deglyph
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
480subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002271348524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deglyph |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 28 February 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deglyph |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 480 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 481 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 481 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,362 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,178 | 86.5% | |
| custom 5384387009055839596 | 99 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5382280323302188731 | 80 | 5.87% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.367% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,362reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 February 2025 to 28 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
очень много интересных заявок было(100+), не смогли принять всех, к сожалению. кого не взяли - не расстраивайтесь, возможно, мы еще поработаем. Форму оставим открытой, можете кидать заявки, если будут сильные кандидаты, то возможно будем добавлять
custom 53822803233021887313
НАБОР В ДАО решили с парнями сделать новое объединение, дао, фнф, называйте как хотите. цель: найти единомышленников, создать мощное закрытое коммьюнити, плотно выносить маркет. от нас: постоянная комуникация, инфо ресурсы, боты, парсеры и софты ждём всех смартиков, возьмём до 10 чел, бесплатно естественно. заполняйте форму ниже: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc1GdiaCHSGFOa07_7TyaggHgHpJUQm19W5EoqtQ34rDt…
👍4
Пару апдейтов по OCS Pro: Добавили трекинг китов по различным мемам, последние 2 недели выносим стабильно всей приваткой. Добавили новостник, на листингах и каких-то событиях тоже спокойно выносится. Также начинаем понемногу колить различные разлоки\дропы\листинги\рагпуллы (в общем все, чем занимается СНГ последний месяц). Ну и соланка оживает, объемы возвращаются, как и ДЦАшки (пару сделок в неделю стабильно кормят)…
👍112custom 53843870090558395969custom 53822803233021887316
Пока мало ДЦА на рыночке, нашли для парней имбовую темку, последние 2 дня активно изучаем и параллельно дрочкуем + параллельно пишутся скринеры\парсеры\боты под это все дело, чтобы облегчить абуз. Че за темка: hyperliquid это декс биржа для фьючей, там видно кто что открывает\закрывает. Находишь пиздатого кита-инсайдера и абузишь (за сегодня 3 варианта как выносить нашли, все протестили на практике, результат пиздаты…
👍169custom 538438700905583959613custom 53822803233021887317👎3
Фортуна на вашей стороне: Итоги розыгрыша Glyph! Поздравляем победителей! 1) 86976599 — 100$ 2) 47508572 — 50$ 3) 01982503 — 50$ Месяц подписки: 4) 03110883 5) 44972624 6) 59045539 7) 51482564 В розыгрыше участвовали только те, кто имел деп и хотя бы какой-нибудь объем торгов (отбросили пустые акки) Если увидели свой UID, напишите @glyphmanager со скрином где виден ваш UID 💲 Glyph | Guide | OCS Pro (покупка) | …
👍170custom 538438700905583959618custom 538228032330218873110👎2
Кто-то еще не вышел с позиций, мы и сами еще небольшую часть позиций держим на всякий случай В основном зашли в фарт, так как много крупных ДЦА на него в моменте пришло Аккуратнее ближайшие пару часов: рисково заходить, потому что биток может в любой момент как ебануться вниз, так и продолжить рост 💲 Glyph | Guide | OCS Pro (покупка) | Mexc 💲
👍204custom 538438700905583959616custom 538228032330218873114
За последние полчаса примерно вот столько ДЦАшек навалилось Плюс биток мега волатильный был, короче сидели в ахуе все че могу сказать, камбек дца Следующим постом закину PNL 💲 Glyph | Guide | OCS Pro (покупка) | Mexc 💲
👍175custom 538438700905583959614custom 538228032330218873113
рынок оживает? залутали только что движение по фарту, аве и арку розыгрыш переносим еще на 7 дней (так как мало участников), результат 8 марта — порадуете свою девушку маму чтобы участвовать в розыгрыше у вас должен быть деп 🙂 💲 Glyph | Guide | OCS Pro (покупка) | Mexc 💲
👍183custom 538228032330218873116custom 538438700905583959616
Итак, рынок мемов чуть по чуть восстанавливается: объемы торгов мемов бекаются, кол-во дневных ДЦА-ордеров выросло, да и по собственным ощущениям торговля ДЦАшек в последние дни становится проще. Также некоторые крупные команды (которые раньше запускали 100млн-млрд мемы) планируют скоро снова лаунчить — хороший знак для нас и рынка мемов в целом. Ну и финалочка SEC: мемы НЕ являются ценными бумагами в соответствии с…
👍161custom 538438700905583959613custom 538228032330218873111
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @deglyph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,124,666 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Glyph” (@deglyph), 480 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deglyph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.