Biggie just hit a new ATH but this narrative deserves so much more. HIGHER!!!! ⚡️
😁15🔥14🎉12❤8👍5

Channel
@degennkol
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
94subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002380363991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @degennkol |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/degennkol |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 94 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 97 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 97 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 98 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,039 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 236 | 22.7% | |
| 🔥 | 226 | 21.8% | |
| 👍 | 196 | 18.9% | |
| ❤ | 192 | 18.5% | |
| 🎉 | 189 | 18.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,039reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2025 to 5 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Biggie just hit a new ATH but this narrative deserves so much more. HIGHER!!!! ⚡️
😁15🔥14🎉12❤8👍5
$Biggie did a 2x and now it’s climbing back up from the dip tbh strong narrative. ⚡️
😁16🎉10👍10❤9🔥9
🐶 Welcome to Biggie — the heavyweight memecoin! Only Dog followed by $Manyu on Instagram. $Manyu Instagram LINK $Biggie instagram LINK Ca- 0x95aE252633e9ea03BdfE67874B349b41163464Ce Biggie’s no ordinary dog. He’s an American Bully with gold chains, Ethereum bones, and a pack that’s all about loyalty, memes, and moon missions. $BIGGIE isn’t just a Memecoin — it’s where top dogs stack bags and bark all the way up. X-…
🎉8❤5🔥4😁3👍1
Some people out here posting rugs in rows paid promos too, IMAOOO 😂 Stay safe out there, degens! If the market volume is bad, there is no need to share anything simple
😁13❤12🔥11👍10🎉8
told you degens XiaoBai sending 4x ⚡️⚡️
🎉14🔥13😁11❤10👍6
XiaoBai’s got a strong narrative deserves to be send. It’s firing green candles right now ape more. ⚡️
😁18❤11👍10🔥10🎉6
Send the cute dog even higher. ⚡️ $XIAOBAI
🔥14😁13🎉11❤8👍8
XiaoBai Buy! 🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 🔀 Spent $257.78 (0.1 ETH) 🔀 Got 1,399,328,521,639 XIAOBAI 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $185,849 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
👍14🔥12😁10❤9🎉9
XiaoBai - $XIAOBAI Younger Brother of Famous Tik Tok Shiba Manyu! Telegram: https://t.me/XiaobaiOnEth X: https://x.com/XiaobaiOnEth Website: https://xiaobaishiba.com/ CA: 0xcb69E5750f8dC3b69647B9d8B1f45466ace0A027
🔥13😁12❤10🎉10👍9
Good morning Degens I’ve been watching the market nonstop too many paid shillers out there. Nothing worth posting today, passed on everything. Haven’t seen a single real X from anyone. ⚡️⚡️
😁14🔥13❤11👍10🎉6
$BOB sending 2x ⚡️
😁16🔥14❤8🎉7👍7
Video, posted without a caption
👍18🔥12😁11❤8🎉5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @degennkol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@degennkol named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Degen Calls ♠️” (@degennkol), 94 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degennkol.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.