4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 637–639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 23:17
637
-1
14 Aug 2026, 08:38
638
-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:48
639
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:59
639
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
63.6%
avg views ÷ 637 subscribers
Avg views / post
405
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
20 (11 May 2025 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,429
Reactions total
71
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
354 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
201
56.8%
🔥
88
24.9%
🤔
20
5.65%
❤
15
4.24%
👏
8
2.26%
😢
7
1.98%
🦄
6
1.69%
😁
3
0.847%
🐳
2
0.565%
👎
1
0.282%
💩
1
0.282%
🗿
1
0.282%
🤯
1
0.282%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Варианта фарминга от Ethan DeFi для расширения кругозора
1️⃣ Лупинг reUSD/USDT на Morpho: в среднем 20% годовых + поинты Re, которые могут оказаться ценными.
2️⃣ Лупинг PT-USD3/USDC на Pendle: сейчас APR около 40% (только USD3 – сомнительный и малоликвидный стейбл).
3️⃣ На Aave V4 раздают награды за займ USDC. Это позволяет занимать стейблы под залог cbBTC, WBTC, WETH всего под 2% и фармить их с большим APR.
4️⃣ …
На днях агрегатор 1inch выкатил Aqua – слой ликвидности внутри протокола.
Как это работает для пользователя?
Чтобы создать позицию, нужно выбрать пару, диапазон, размер комиссии и дать апрувы на нужные активы. После этого остаётся ждать, когда позиция окажется самой выгодной для свапа (сами активы остаются на кошельке, а позиций можно создать много).
Как это работает на уровне протокола?
Когда кто-то через 1inch …
Несколько новостей из мира DeFi
1️⃣ 1inch открыла публичный доступ к Aqua – общему слою ликвидности для DeFi. Одновременно стартовала программа вознаграждений на Merkl.
2️⃣ В Robinhood Chain стартовал первый airdrop. Кошельки, совершившие транзакции в течение первого миллиона блоков, могут проверить право на получение награды.
3️⃣ Zcash активировала обновление Ironwood и перевела приватные транзакции в новый пул. …
Revert готовит что-то интересное: Stable Hooks для автоматизации управления ликвидностью в Uniswap v4.
Ого!
Да, это будет хук для пулов с коррелирующими активами (USDC/USDT или wstETH/WETH). Вместо стандартной модели v4 он использует механику, похожую на StableSwap от Curve.
А как работает?
Разработчики пишут: «Инженерия хука нетривиальна и не имеет аналитического решения. Хук работает по методу Ньютона-Рафсона н…
Биткоин упал на 54% от своего пика, но это не так уж много. Каждый предыдущий медвежий рынок BTC был хуже этого.
Падение цены с $126k до $58k, индекс страха и жадности на 18 – и это или самый мягкий медвежий рынок в истории, или дно ещё впереди.
Насколько сейчас сложно держать ETH? Очень сложно: только один раз в истории столько ETH было в убытке на протяжении столь долгого периода и это медвежий рынок 2018 года.
— Даже крах FTX не создавал такого уровня стресса.
— COVID был жестоким, но быстрым.
— Тарифная война тоже прошла незаметно.
Сейчас же держатели ETH проходят затяжное состояние капитуляции, когда убытки сохраняются, убеждённость слабеет, а руки ст…
Несколько новостей из мира DeFi
1️⃣ Павел Дуров анонсировал новый кошелек Gram, который будет нативно доступен в Telegram и позволит отправлять криптовалюту без комиссий.
2️⃣ Госдума приняла во втором и третьем чтениях закон, который легализует оборот криптовалюты в РФ. Cюрпризов нет. Выжимка закона здесь.
3️⃣ Трамп согласился включить в CLARITY Act положения об этике, что устраняет одно из главных препятствий для…
А Monad неплохо держится, особенно на фоне Sonic и Berachain. TVL сети достигла нового максимума в $700 млн. за счёт недавнего развертывания Aave и Pendle.
За депозит на Aave, кстати, раздают WMON в качестве награды (общий APR для USDT0 и USDC около 6%)
Revert запустился на Robinhood Chain. Пока только для v3 пулов, но уже можно посмотреть, сколько лихие парни поднимают на мемах: даже на полном диапазоне это под 1000% годовых 🫠
Метамаску несколько дней назад исполнилось 10 лет. В честь этого команда выкатила ten.metamask.io, куда можно вбить адрес кошелька и посмотреть по нему общую статистику плюс получить памятную карточку (сверху карточка vitalik.eth)
Аппаратные кошельки
Аппаратный кошелек это физическое устройство, которое хранит приватный ключ от криптовалютных адресов в изолированной среде.
Это не просто флешка с зашифрованным ключом, а устройство, которое позволяет производить транзакции только при физическом подтверждении (это может быть ввода пин-кода или отпечаток пальца).
Приватный ключ встроен в аппаратный кошелек и его невозможно достать, даже если ва…
👍16❤3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @defiver. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DeFiver” (@defiver), 637 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/defiver.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.