Channel
@defcon_report
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
208subscribers
+152 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003369976036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @defcon_report |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/defcon_report |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:09 | 208 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:05 | 207 | +6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 201 | +10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 191 | +20 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 05:35 | 171 | +49 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 122 | +59 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 63 | +7 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 56 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤯 | 16 | 25.8% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 16.1% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 16.1% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 11.3% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 11.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 😐 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⏺Sabotage on the railway network has been reported in the Netherlands, according to Bloomberg “Unidentified individuals left pipes on the tracks at 24 locations across the country. Disruptions have affected the central, northern and eastern parts of the country. The State Secretary has announced the launch of an investigation.” The authorities are not directly accusing Russia, but the incidents occurred against the…
🤬1🤯1😐1
The US has deployed its first officially recognised space weapon, the US Air Force Secretary has stated — WP This is the first time Washington has confirmed the existence of offensive capabilities in orbit. Maink noted that this weapon is already ‘in orbit’ and is intended for ‘space control’ and to protect US troops from ‘actions by hostile adversaries’. One US official stated that these assets could potentially …
❤1👍1🤯1
Russian is trying to make out the end of the endless queue at the petrol station through his binoculars
😁2🤯1
Biletsky: The 3rd Army Corps has launched the ‘Vivaldi’ offensive in the north of the Donetsk region. Novoselivka, Oleksandrivka, Yarove and the outskirts of Korovyi Yar have been cleared of enemy forces, and Seredne has been liberated. A total of 75 km² has been cleared. A further 10 km² has been de-occupied. Russian losses are estimated at approximately 1,500 soldiers, over 12,000 drones and hundreds of armoured …
👍2🔥1🤯1
"In the event of military action against Moscow, Warsaw would be wiped out within 2–3 days," said Putin’s aide Patrushev.
👎2🌚1😐1
Overnight, Ukrainian UAVs attacked four targets on Russian territory: 🛑The Syzran Oil Refinery in the Samara Region (1,2); 🛑Taganrog: the ‘Molniya’ UAV manufacturing plant and the ‘Beriev’ aircraft repair plant were attacked (3); 🛑Explosions were also recorded at a cement factory in the Volgograd region, 400 km from the GGU (4).
❤2👍1🔥1
⚠️The President of Lithuania has stated that NATO fighter jets shot down an unidentified drone over Lithuanian territory, which came from Belarus
🤯3🤬1😐1
🤯At some Russian oil refineries, shipping containers have begun to be installed as a passive defence against UAVs. The photo shows the Novoshakhtinsk and Nizhny Novgorod oil refineries.
😁2❤1👍1🤯1
A Ukrainian FPV drone with a grenade launcher.🤯
🤯3👍1😁1
Russian ships in the Baltic Sea have begun to be painted with camouflage patterns depicting the silhouettes of houses with windows.🙃
😁2👍1🤯1
The Russian stock market jumped by around 3 per cent following Trump’s statement.
👎3🤬1
Satellite images of the Russian drone base at Tsymbulovo in the Oryol Region, taken two years apart
🤬3👎1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @defcon_report. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Defcon Report” (@defcon_report), 208 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/defcon_report.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.