Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

деф2елс🐾

@def2els

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001996782114
TypeChannel
Username@def2els
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/def2els

Growth

100101100.512 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 101 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 07:34 — 100 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 19:1613 Aug 2026, 07:34
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:34100-1
12 Aug 2026, 19:16101first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 05s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

131 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3426.0%
❤‍🔥3022.9%
🙏2519.1%
custom 52603374915750557341511.5%
96.87%
custom 523564578901486876264.58%
💋64.58%
💘32.29%
custom 523110102212597174421.53%
custom 547007029664600614310.763%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @efiasarchivesVideo

04.07.26 👔🪽 c: darcy vega; b: zodiac academy;

1

8 Jun 2026, 16:13 UTC192 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

guys my age don’t know how to treat me but they definitely know #эдвитс

9❤‍🔥8🙏8💋1

8 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Емае, уже два года этому каналу и первому эдиту, что я выложила

1

8 Jun 2026, 15:16 UTC46 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @strnl8lVideo

у меня сломался алайт 😔😔

8 Jun 2026, 15:14 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026

всем выжившим привет, новый эдит в 19:00 !!! надеюсь вам всем понравится

21 May 2026, 04:15 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @esc8pismVideo

коллаб года 1 парт я 2 парт эйвери 3 парт привет это я таня

2

5 Apr 2026, 21:31 UTC163 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вы посмотрите на эти АХУЕННЫЕ переходы 💔💔💔💔

1

5 Apr 2026, 21:31 UTC137 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я хочу чтобы Таня научила меня монтировать умоляю

1

5 Apr 2026, 21:30 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @strnl8lVideo

эх максимка.......

3

1 Apr 2026, 18:42 UTC452 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

happy april fool 🤩 #эдвитс

15❤‍🔥8custom 52356457890148687626custom 52603374915750557342

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @def2els. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 690,193 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“деф2елс🐾” (@def2els), 100 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/def2els.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.