Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Глубины групповой психологии

Channel

Глубины групповой психологии

@deepgrouppsychology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

775subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002658591242
TypeChannel
Username@deepgrouppsychology
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deepgrouppsychology

Growth

7757777767 August 2026 — 777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 777 subscribers14 August 2026 — 775 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 775–777 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:18775-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:48777no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:51777first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 775 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,256
Reactions total167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12465.3%
🔥5026.3%
❤‍🔥52.63%
💯52.63%
😢42.11%
🆒10.526%
🤝10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC223 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги и интересующиеся глубинной групповой психологией! Наша ассоциация стремительно растет и мы, «как взрослые» хотим регулярно проводить ОТКРЫТЫЕ ЭФИРЫ. Первые 2 эфира проведу я, президент АСГГПП, Ковалёва Людмила. Далее слово передам методистам и представителям нашей ассоциации. Мы сделали форму регистрации на нашем сайте. Ссылка в зум будет теперь приходить на указанную вами почту. До встречи на эфире 9

14🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC129 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие! Срочная новость! На глубинный женский интенсив в Степурино 14 - 16 августа 2026 появилось 2 места. Рассмотрю заявки только тех, кого знаю лично и кто готов к глубинной исследовательской работе с неочевидным результатом. Тема будет: «Чрево жизни и таинство Возрождения» Пишите мне в личку @kovalevalyuda

2

31 Jul 2026, 04:47 UTC245 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Доброе утро! У меня созрела сложная тема для открытого эфира. Хочу поделиться этими мыслями. Думаю об этом уже 2 недели. И вот только сейчас сформулировала тему: «О нарциссической основе онкологических манифестаций и значимости социальных связей для их профилактики» Дату и время напишу чуть позже. Ковалёва Людмила.

🔥2413❤‍🔥5💯2🤝1🆒1

30 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC231 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наталья Платонова приглашает вас на запланированную конференцию: Zoom. Тема: Открытый эфир "Игры сиблингов" Время: 30 июл. 2026 07:00 PM Москва Присоединиться к конференции Zoom https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87584675996?pwd=BmzyX08WEAxu7i5sWbPQJOI1M0tEGm.1 Ссылка на чат конференции https://us06web.zoom.us/launch/jc/87584675996 Идентификатор конференции: 875 8467 5996 💎 Код доступа: 361059 ---

4

28 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC197 viewsread 8 August 2026

Еженедельная группа «Ментализирующая среда» начинается завтра 29 июля с 8 до 9:30 по Мск. Если я кому то обещала, но забыла включить в чат - пишите мне срочно в личку. Ковалёва Людмила.

27 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC215 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дорогие! В эти выходные с 31 июля по 2 августа 2026 едем в Санкт-Петербург! Кто едет - напишите мне в личку, пожалуйста @kovalevalyuda Напомните о себе, а то я боюсь кого-то забыть. Кто хочет осенью участвовать в качестве куратора в ГРАНД - ПРОЕКТЕ «Городские сказки» и имеет возможность приехать в СПб - это было бы замечательно! (если ранее не были разумеется). 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 2й Летний интенсив глубинной групповой психо

2

27 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC192 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Внимание! Методист нашей ассоциации Наталья Платонова проведет Открытый, бесплатный эфир Игры сиблингов. Братья и сёстры — это наши первые партнёры по жизни. С ними мы учимся любить, дружить, соперничать, заботиться, защищать и защищаться. Многие сценарии взаимодействий в социуме корнями уходят в отношениях с сиблингами и потом воспроизводятся автоматически всю жизнь. Чтобы разобраться в этом вопросе, приглашаем

22

25 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC193 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я и представители образованной мной Ассоциации специалистов глубинной групповой психологической практики развиваем идентичность - Глубинный групповой психолог. Моя авторская модель, которая легла в основу, называется «ИТОГ» - исследовательские трансформационные обучающие группы. Около 15 групп в модели и это не окончательная цифра. Присоединяйтесь - развивайтесь вместе с нами! Для ознакомления с критериями вступлени

11

25 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC171 viewsread 8 August 2026

Как хорошо, когда с утра задают предметные вопросы) Людмила, а как бы вы назвали свой подход в работе, помимо глубинного? Имею в виду, не могу найти описание того, чем, условно, вы работает. Каких подходов придерживаетесь? Или сплав из чего Психоанализ, Сонди, ЭОТ?

25 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC166 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Напоминаю, о возможности заказать мою новую книгу у Юлии Анатольевны Пишите Юле [email protected] для заказа себе! А Тверским можно сегодня и завтра к 19ч подойти на Советскую 62. В офисе есть 15 книг. Вручу лично.

3

25 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC178 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здравствуйте. Я не могу рассуждать про символдраму, не имея опыта работы в этом методе. Здесь нам понадобиться специалист с опытом 15+ лет в символдраме. А общие рассуждения у меня такие. Когда начинаешь работать - метод выбирается по отклику нашей психической структуры. Вдумчивым интровертам часто более по душе - психоанализ, а, например, психодрамма привлекает совершенно другой тип личности. Если специалист «подлеч

14🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deepgrouppsychology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 188,690 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Глубины групповой психологии” (@deepgrouppsychology), 775 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deepgrouppsychology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.