جالب بود

Channel
𝕯𝖊𝖊𝖕 𝖎𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖔𝖈𝖊𝖆𝖓
@deep_ocean_2007
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004368665914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deep_ocean_2007 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deep_ocean_2007 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:22 | 144 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:47 | 144 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.04%
- avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7.3
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 138 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 83
- Videos
- 7
- Links
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
لیندا پاگانو — «Strongsville Jane Doe» نام: Linda Marie Pagano کشور: ایالات متحده آمریکا سال: ۱۹۷۴ قربانی: لیندا پاگانو، ۱۷ ساله محل: آکرون و استرانگسویل، اوهایو عامل: نامشخص نتیجه: هویت لیندا پس از ۴۴ سال مشخص شد، اما قتل او همچنان حلنشده است. لیندا در سال ۱۹۷۴ دانشآموز دبیرستان بود و در آکرون، اوهایو زندگی میکرد. در شب ۳۱ اوت ۱۹۷۴ به همراه دوستپسرش به یک کنسرت رفته بود. صبح روز بعد، پس از بازگشت به خانه، با نا…
میشه اینو بیشتر دوست داشته باشید براش زحمت کشیدم🫠
این پیام رو فور کنید+ ID; تا بگم اگه سرباز بودید اسلحهتون چی بود 𝐁𝖾 𝐉𝗈𝗂𝗇 : 𝐀𝗅𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝐒𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾
این پیام رو فور کنید؛ حدس بزنم MBTI چنلتون چیه. 𝐁𝖾 𝐉𝗈𝗂𝗇 : 𝐀𝗅𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝐒𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾
منو با این اهنگ تنها بزارید😭🚶♀
حس حسادت و غرق شدن؟ معلومه که میگم Her face از ایزابل لاروزا
چ جوجوعهه💙🥹
https://t.me/deep_ocean_2007
پین و متنش*
◟ariana collectionne ⊹ . ݁˖ avec délicatesse
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @deep_ocean_2007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@sepia79 · 1053 posts𝐀𝗅𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝐒𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾
@AliveInSilence · 2,3292 posts◟ari rêve
@luxeGrande · 262 posts𝓐urevia
@Aurrevia · 1,0071 post𝐌𝐨𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐰
@Taehyun200 · 1201 post◦•●.آســمــ ــان مــن.●•◦
@cnm7d · 41 post𝖲𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗇 𝖯𝖺𝖼𝗄 🆕
@nivrapa · 5411 post𝐕𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐞
@vkook_vampire · 5521 postChallenge
@xxxsiruissss · 91 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕯𝖊𝖊𝖕 𝖎𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖔𝖈𝖊𝖆𝖓” (@deep_ocean_2007), 144 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deep_ocean_2007.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.