Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DeDust.io ES – TON DEX

@dedust_es

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

147subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001897850006
TypeChannel
Username@dedust_es
DescriptionDEX: dedust.io Chat: t.me/dedust_en_chat Bot: @dedustBot X: x.com/dedust_io Inglés: @dedust_en Asociación: contact@dedust.io
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dedust_es

Growth

1476 August 2026 — 147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 147 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 20:31147no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:48147first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Videos
7
Links
53

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

108 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2422.2%
🔥2422.2%
2018.5%
🦄1614.8%
🐳109.26%
🎉87.41%
🤓65.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jun 2026, 15:00 UTC125 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔒 No la quemes: bloquéala Lanzar un token siempre va de confiar. Los traders quieren garantías de que el desarrollador no hará un rug pull el primer día. Normalmente, los creadores queman los tokens LP o dependen de lockers de terceros. Pero ¿por qué quemar algo que puede seguir generando ingresos? 💡 En la página de depósito de liquidez para los pools CPMM v2, hay disponible una función nativa de bloqueo. Puedes e

🔥3👍2🦄1

7 May 2026, 14:40 UTC92 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 100 millones de dólares en el Enrutador de DeDust Ese es el volumen total que nuestro agregador de liquidez ha procesado hasta ahora. De hecho, algún que otro millón más. Este es un hito importante para nosotros y para todo el ecosistema TON. Miles de gracias a todos los traders, LPs y partners. ¿Quieres integrarlo en tu producto? Encuéntranos en: @dedust_dev_chat. Se vienen cositas, El equipo de DeDust🔸 TMA |

2🦄1

25 Apr 2026, 11:46 UTC87 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Se quedaron despiertos toda la noche solo por ti ❤️ En nuestra publicación anterior explicamos cómo los estafadores se hacen pasar por miembros del equipo de DeDust y de otros protocolos para engañarte y conseguir que les des acceso a tus fondos. “Vaya, qué listos”, podrías pensar. “Eso es solo el principio”, diríamos nosotros. 🔒 A veces llegan incluso a crear chats grupales completamente falsos, con administrado

👍3🎉21🐳1🤓1

25 Apr 2026, 11:45 UTC56 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Tu pool, tus reglas 🔒 Con el lanzamiento de CPMM v2 en DeDust, ahora es posible crear pools con configuraciones personalizadas. Al crear un pool, puedes elegir tanto el tamaño de la comisión como el activo en el que se recaudan las comisiones. 🔍 Las comisiones son bastante sencillas: Se cobra entre un 0,1% y un 5% de cada intercambio a los traders. De esa cantidad, el 70% de todas las comisiones se distribuye entre

👍2🔥2🦄21

10 Apr 2026, 15:25 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Velocidaaaaad Hoy, los validadores de la red han aprobado la actualización Catchain 2.0, aumentando la velocidad de producción de bloques aproximadamente 6 veces. Esto significa que los swaps en DeDust se ejecutan ahora en ~1 segundo. Enhorabuena a TON Core y a todo el ecosistema por esta actualización. TMA | Web | Twitter | Community

2🔥2👍1

10 Apr 2026, 14:20 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Menos hablar, más integraciones ⚙️ Desde marzo de 2025, el enrutador de DeDust ha procesado casi 86 millones de dólares en volumen. Pero las cifras no son lo principal. Lo importante es que equipos de todo el ecosistema confían en nosotros para gestionar el enrutamiento de swaps para sus usuarios. 🔄 Nuestro router ya es usado por: MyTonWallet, uno de las billeteras TON más populares. GroypFi, una plataforma todo

🐳2👍2🦄1

28 Mar 2026, 09:40 UTC78 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

WalletConnect × TON ⚙️ No es ningún secreto que tanto los degens de EVM como los grandes players — incluidos grandes fondos — están acostumbrados a confiar en infraestructuras verdaderamente probadas para mantener sus activos seguros. Hasta ahora, entrar en el ecosistema TON significaba crear billeteras separadas y adaptarse a un nuevo flujo, lo cual era una barrera significativa para muchos. Con la actualización

1👍1🔥1🦄1

22 Mar 2026, 16:05 UTC70 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Incluso las ballenas lloran 💸 Muchos de vosotros probablemente ya habréis oído la historia de alguien que intercambió 50 millones de dólares por unos tokens que valían solo 36.000$ (tranquilos, esto ocurrió en Ethereum, no en TON). Sí — alguien pulsó el botón de “swap”, confirmó la transacción y básicamente lo perdió casi todo. ⚠️ Esto ocurrió por el Price Impact (Impacto en el Precio)— el efecto que una operación

👍3🐳1🔥1🤓1

21 Mar 2026, 18:50 UTC67 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Necesitamos tu frase semilla 🛎️ ¿Algo te huele extraño? Así es exactamente como funciona la estafa más simple y, a la vez, más devastadoramente efectiva: la suplantación de identidad. Un sospechosamente educado “soporte de DeDust” aparece en tus mensajes privados, te ofrece amablemente ayuda con una transacción atascada… y termina finamente vaciando por completo el acceso a tu billetera. Dejemos claros los concept

🎉1👍1🤓1

12 Mar 2026, 11:05 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ Digest 005: Bloqueador de liquidez para pools CPMM v2 El invierno por fin ha llegado a su fin. Hemos pasado la mayor parte del tiempo escribiendo código y diseñando interfaces. Como todos los inviernos. Como todos los meses de cada año. ¡Nos encanta escribir código y diseñar! Se ha trabajado mucho en el lado de la infraestructura, pero también hay algunos cambios visibles. 🔒 En la página de depósito de liquidez

🔥21👍1

20 Nov 2025, 12:52 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🤔 CPMM v2: nuevos pools en DeDust Ayer se cumplieron tres años desde que empezamos a desarrollar DeFi en TON — creando productos útiles y fáciles de usar tanto para los usuarios como para los builders 🎂 Durante los últimos meses, hemos estado trabajando en un nuevo tipo de liquidity pool, más rentable para los creadores de tokens e igual de práctico para los traders. La actualización de hoy aborda uno de los princi

1👍1🦄1

19 Nov 2025, 12:45 UTC70 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @x1000_esVideo

🟢 Uranus: lanza memes directamente en x1000 Ha pasado poco más de un mes desde que se activó la terminal, y cerca de 1.500 usuarios ya han probado x1000.finance, descubriendo lo fácil que es encontrar, analizar y comerciar con tokens. Ahora es el momento de crear los tuyos. Te presentamos 🌚 Uranus, una herramienta que te permite lanzar meme tokens con un solo clic. Características principales: ⚡️ El 70% de las co

2🔥2🐳1👍1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dedust_es. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 269,744 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DeDust.io ES – TON DEX” (@dedust_es), 147 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dedust_es.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.