Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДедушкаВскорлупе

Channel

ДедушкаВскорлупе

@dedushkavskorlupe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002376866833
TypeChannel
Username@dedushkavskorlupe
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dedushkavskorlupe

Growth

3234336 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33 subscribers6 September 2026 — 34 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 12:0234+1
30 Aug 2026, 03:4433+1
22 Aug 2026, 23:4732-1
11 Aug 2026, 01:0133no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:5433first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

106 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2624.5%
custom 53077571388634884872018.9%
🔥1917.9%
😭87.55%
🤯87.55%
🤷‍♂76.60%
👎54.72%
👍43.77%
🤔32.83%
🌭10.943%
🍌10.943%
💊10.943%
💩10.943%
🖕10.943%
🤮10.943%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Apr 2026, 16:44 UTC420 views20 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Секретная концовка

🤯8😭43custom 53077571388634884873🌭1🔥1

18 Jan 2026, 06:25 UTC255 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Брэд концепция🍩 Арт рисовался для Сиби Софт📞

🔥5custom 53077571388634884875💩1🖕1🤮1

14 Nov 2025, 17:16 UTC272 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Блин, чёт не пойму, смешной мем получился или не очень... Смешной👍? Или всё же не оч👎? Только пожалуйста без агрессии🙏

👎5🤔3🍌1

21 Aug 2025, 21:18 UTC263 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Целый месяц потратил на сценарий для новеллы на https://t.me/jamof100flowers , но щас перечитал его и понял, что получилось хуево и желания доделывать работу совсем не осталось. Да в общем то я бы и не успел. Последнее время хочется успеть везде и сразу, но чёт из рук всё валится. Надеюсь это временная шняга, а не старость 🤒

😭31

26 Jul 2025, 07:08 UTC242 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

По работе пока ниче показать не могу толком. Но мы в общем-то пока ниче и не сделали особо. Лишь скетчи да концепты. В офисе работать прикольно. Рабочая обстановка и все дела. Единственный минус - забитое метро, но это мелочи

5😭1

3 Jul 2025, 17:30 UTC217 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Как же я обожаю музыку в пятёрочке

1

24 Jun 2025, 07:10 UTC222 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Как-то давно у меня заказали концепт для втюб модели. Терпеть не могу этот ваш втюб, но работу я сделал. Может только с вайбом слегка переборчик. То то они мне больше не писали...

🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @dedushkavskorlupe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДедушкаВскорлупе” (@dedushkavskorlupe), 34 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dedushkavskorlupe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.