Channel
@decoratedshed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
421subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001110234604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @decoratedshed |
| Created | 20 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/decoratedshed |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 421 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 417 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 417 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 16 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
81 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 42.0% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 16.0% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 13.6% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 8.64% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 December 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Попробовал себя в непривычно широкой теме — повествование местами получилось больше эстетическое, чем академическое, но таковы законы жанра (а ещё тут действительно великолепные иллюстрации). Тем не менее, постарались обойтись без популярных мифов и постоянно напоминать об исторических и материальных предпосылках модернистской архитектуры. И что особенно важно, предложить здоровое, без всяческих оговорок рассмотрение…
❤1
Модернизм как классика. 100 лет современности Мы месте с Вадимом Даниловым написали книгу про модернизм. Не только советский и не только архитектурный — а вообще весь. Иногда очень полезно вынимать голову из глубоких пещер архивных загадок и пересказывать вещи, которые вроде бы известны всем. Потому что это самое «известное всем» заключает в себе множество мифов и неточностей. Одни из них можно быстро уточнить, дру…
🔥5❤1👍1
Ремонт фасадов московских панелек далеко не всегда бывает удачным, но последние годы даже начали появляться вполне вменяемые примеры. Столь разрушительный подход, однако, на моей памяти появляется впервые. Москва начала бороться со своей знаковой серией КОПЭ, старательно зачищая фасады от любых архитектурных излишеств и тем самым унифицируя по облику одни из самых красивых типовых домов с реновационной халтурой. На ф…
😢11💔2🔥1
Давно хотел увидеть первоначальный проект знаменитого «Смоленского пассажа», и к своему удовольствию всё-таки нашёл его в каталоге работ Рикардо Бофилла 1992 года. Про него вроде как всем известно, что Бофилл начал за здравие, получил в нагрузку Юрия Григорьева с командой, не справился с напором московских архитектурных чиновников, нерадивостью застройщика и, в конце концов, был отстранён от проекта. Забрал свой гоно…
🤔5❤4🤬2🎉1
На фотографии Артёма Светлова 2003 года — здание вскоре после завершения строительства, рядом — 1000 Wilshire Boulevard в Лос-Анджелесе (KPF, 1987)
❤6❤🔥3👎2🔥1🤔1
Последняя масштабная работа Всеволода Тальковского, одного из авторов банковского комплекса на проспекте Сахарова, до которого отсюда всего 200 метров — административное здание МПС-РЖД на Каланчёвской улице (1995–2003 гг.). Запланированное, видимо, под задорным названием «Гудок», оно живо напоминает о работах Kohn Pedersen Fox, отцах корпоративного постмодернизма, застроивших в своё время добрую часть Америки своими …
❤7❤🔥2👎1🤔1
Продолжаем разбираться в истории московских торговых центров: сегодняшний экземпляр стал одним из первых в этом жанре, хотя на фоне открывшихся в том же году «Рамсторов» мог показаться уже морально устаревшим. Из-за особенностей внешнего вида он ассоциируется у многих с самостроем, случайно пережившим «ночь длинных ковшей», а ведь это ещё и архитектурный наследник советских универмагов «Бухарест» и «Вешняки» — проек…
❤15👎1
Подземные переходы через Комсомольский проспект у ТТК построены в модном для начала нулевых духе, который условно можно обозвать чем-то вроде футуристического ар-деко (такого ещё было много в архитектуре железнодорожных станций) и вызывают ассоциации с инфраструктурными проектами британца Иэна Ритчи этого же периода. Это часть масштабного проекта дизайна Третьего кольца, разработанного в 2001 году мастерской Александ…
🔥6👍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @decoratedshed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 446,606 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“воспарить арочками” (@decoratedshed), 421 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/decoratedshed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.