Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Le Débunk Café

Channel

Le Débunk Café

@debunkcafe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002380032773
TypeChannel
Username@debunkcafe
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/debunkcafe

Growth

626362.57 August 2026 — 62 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62 subscribers6 September 2026 — 63 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 30 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:5863+1
10 Aug 2026, 04:1562no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:5162first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2025 to 14 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Nov 2025, 18:32 UTC117 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔍 AFree, le "réseau social africain" présenté comme indépendant, est en réalité piloté par des acteurs russes proches du Kremlin. 🇷🇺 Une enquête dévoile les liens avec African Initiative, la promotion locale et la stratégie d’influence cognitive. 👉 https://debunkcafe.fr/afree-reseau-social-africain-kremlin/

👏2

22 Jun 2025, 14:30 UTC222 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Des images de Fordo prises le 22 juin par Maxar montrent de larges cratères causés par les frappes américaines sur la crête au-dessus du complexe souterrain. Un dépôt de cendres gris-bleu recouvre les abords du site.

22 Jun 2025, 14:25 UTC193 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇷 Iran Le Open Source Centre a créé un modèle 3D du site de Fordow en se basant sur des images du 22 juin 2025. Il montre que les frappes ont visé la zone au-dessus de la salle des cascades, enterrée sous les points d’impact des bombes GBU-57A/B. Sous un autre angle, certains impacts apparaissent alignés pile au-dessus de la principale salle des cascades, ce qui suggère une frappe ciblée contre cette partie clé de

22 Jun 2025, 14:17 UTC132 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇷 Iran Le 21 juin 2025, Donald Trump a annoncé que les États-Unis avaient frappé l'installation nucléaire souterraine de Fordo, en Iran, à l’aide de bombes anti-bunker GBU-57A/B MOP. Des images satellite haute résolution du 22 juin montrent le site après l’attaque. La comparaison des images avant/après révèle des modifications du terrain au-dessus de Fordo : affaissements visibles de la crête montagneuse et possib

22 Jun 2025, 03:48 UTC77 viewsread 10 August 2026

🇺🇸 USA - Iran 🇮🇷 La radio de l'armée israélienne rapporte que les États-Unis n'ont pas attaqué l'usine d'enrichissement d'Ispahan qu'Israël avait attaquée, mais plutôt un autre site creusé dans la montagne où des matériaux enrichis étaient cachés.

22 Jun 2025, 03:40 UTC68 viewsread 10 August 2026

🇮🇱 Israël - Iran 🇮🇷 L'Iran dit n'avoir détecté "aucun signe de contamination" nucléaire après les attaques américaines. (AFP)

22 Jun 2025, 03:30 UTC70 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 USA - Iran 🇮🇷 Selon CNN, citant un responsable américain, les États-Unis ont utilisé six bombardiers B-2 pour larguer, non pas six, mais une douzaine de bombes anti-bunker (GBU-57 A/B) sur le site nucléaire de Fordo en Iran.

22 Jun 2025, 03:15 UTC58 viewsread 10 August 2026

🇮🇱 Israël - Iran 🇮🇷 Selon l'Autorité de régulation nucléaire et radiologique d'Arabie saoudite : Aucun effet radioactif n'a été détecté dans les États du Golfe après avoir ciblé des sites nucléaires iraniens. (Al Araby TV)

22 Jun 2025, 02:38 UTC54 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❌ FACT-CHECK | Cette vidéo est bien évident fausse et ne provient pas des attaques américaines contre les sites nucléaires iraniens. Des traces antérieures de cette vidéo sont facilement trouvables en ligne, comme le montre cette publication du 28 avril.

22 Jun 2025, 02:37 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 USA - Iran 🇮🇷 Selon Fox News, les États-Unis auraient utilisé : 🔹 6 bombes anti-bunker, chacune pesant 15 tonnes, sur le site nucléaire iranien de Fordo ; 🔹 30 missiles de croisière BGM-109 Tomahawk, lancés depuis des sous-marins 🇺🇸 sur les sites de Natanz et d'Ispahan.

22 Jun 2025, 02:37 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

🇮🇷 Iran La télévision iranienne affirme que le président américain bluffe. Les premières informations suggèrent que les frappes américaines n'ont atteint que deux tunnels à Fordo. (via @femmeazadi) ⚠️ À prendre avec prudence en attendant les images des sites concernés.

22 Jun 2025, 02:36 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇱 Israël - Iran 🇮🇷 ❌❌❌ Cette vidéo censée montrer les frappes américaines en Iran date en réalité de décembre 2024, et elle a été prise en Syrie.

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @debunkcafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Le Débunk Café” (@debunkcafe), 63 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/debunkcafe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.