Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

дебатЪ

@debatfunny

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

57subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001836627847
TypeChannel
Username@debatfunny
DescriptionО дебатах без импакта, сравнения и анализа.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/debatfunny

Growth

577 August 2026 — 57 subscribers10 August 2026 — 57 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56–58 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:0157no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:1257first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Videos
6
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡6435.0%
4625.1%
🔥179.29%
😁147.65%
❤‍🔥94.92%
🤣94.92%
👍73.83%
🙏42.19%
👎31.64%
🤔31.64%
👏21.09%
🥰21.09%
😈10.546%
😱10.546%
🤝10.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2023 to 11 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2025, 11:01 UTC90 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Смотрю кадры с агитации, в моё время перваши нужны были только дебатерам, а сейчас вижу скачат и орут все подряд) это не плохо, студенческая движуха растёт) другой вопрос о качестве движа, но по нему судить я не могу, т.к вообще не знаю что там творится Так вот в свое время я первый кто додумался ставить парты возле актовых залов, еще тогда с завхозом договоривался и это буст дал мощный, при выходе перваши видели ед

3👍2👏2🤣2

Signed Азамат

14 Mar 2025, 15:24 UTC203 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Осуждаю

🤡1

Signed Стас Печников

14 Mar 2025, 15:22 UTC198 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Дебатеры дуреют с этой прикормки WW

🤡4😁42🔥1

8 Mar 2025, 14:36 UTC293 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А ну да и кстати, спикер – существо бесполое! Разделяя это вы сами пораждаете гнев! Создавая отдельные турниры, привелегии. Есть дно сприкеры пацаны, есть дно спикеры девочки! Это от гендера не зависит, только от мозгов и желания развиваться! За свою 8 летнюю карьеру я не встречал какого то ущемления женщин в дебатах! Поэтому не страдайте хуйней, делайте турниры для всех, придумывайте новые прикольные организации

🤡207👍3🔥2🤔1

7 Mar 2025, 15:46 UTC293 views44 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Всем привет! Моя активность в дебатном сообществе свелась к 0, но недавно я узнал, что Толю Ляна забанили и я хочу публично его поддержать: Начну с того, что я знаю Толю с 2015 года, мы больше 5 лет конкурировали друг с другом, ненавидели друг друга, но спустя годы я понял, что у меня осталось к Толе только уважение за его вклад в дебаты, за те эмоции, которые он подарил мне играя против меня, потому что только с ни

🤡1814❤‍🔥6🙏4🤔2

3 Mar 2025, 06:04 UTC228 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Без негатива

🤡173🔥3🥰2

29 Jan 2025, 15:42 UTC246 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Скоро регистрацию открою)

👍2

28 Jan 2025, 17:50 UTC234 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Как я понял ЛД уже никто не играет, а новое поколение вообще ни разу в него не играло … Не порядок) Хочу турик сделать онлайн на 100к) Может хоть кого-то заинтересует этот формат) потому что именно ЛД – тру дебаты, которые помогут вам в жизни, а не вот это вот сидение за партами, уткнув взгляд в ноут)

🔥72👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @debatfunny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“дебатЪ” (@debatfunny), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/debatfunny.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.