Channel
@dearwanda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440504213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dearwanda |
| Description | Ведёт: @tasia_meln🦋 @somebodylwd💙 Контролит: @whatdoyouwant_t Основной канал: @hrurvel |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dearwanda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 42 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 42 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
47 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 36 | 76.6% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 10.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 4.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2022 to 2 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я очень хочу, чтобы этот канал жил и процветал и дальше, даже без моего ведения. Поэтому на канал обьявляется поиск ведущего. Из требований: -знание персонажа -хороший уровень русского языка -время и желание вести канал(не 3 дня) Если ты, да, именно ты, понимаешь ответственность и все еще чувствуешь желание занять это место – милости прошу ко мне в лс @tasia_meln Услышимся ещё на волнах Хрюрвела💙
😢21❤🔥2👍2
//наверное, многие заметили мою пропажу с канала, за что прошу прощение Но пришла я не с лучшими новостями. Спустя год ведения канала я просто выгорела к персонажу, что мне было сложно признать даже себе самой😔 Хочу поблагодарить вас всех за это прекрасное время и этот шикарнейший опыт. Спасибо за каждое хорошое слово, каждую реакцию и даже каждую эмоцию, что вы пережили со мной на этом канале💙💙💙 Хочется ещё много в…
😢15
//простите, сюжет будет чутка позже, у меня тут небольшие проблемы😬
Чертовы пробки! Почему всё сегодня против меня? Но не волнуйся, я уже скоро буду. И да, собирайся, мы кое-куда поедем)
Кстати, ты как там? Всё в порядке?
Эта лисья морда хотел отправить меня на задание! Я его мягко послала😒 Нечего мешать моим делам, а преступники и подождут лишние несколько часов
Доброе утро, милая. Надеюсь, завтрак тебе понравился и ты всё сьела до того, как уйти с дома. А меня срочно вызвал Фьюри, но сегодняшний вечер мы обязаны провести с тобой вместе, так что ничего не планируй😉
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
📒 С утра тебя разбудили не уже привычные поцелуи в плечо, затем шею, щеку и нос, а лай Мишельки с коридора. Ты перевернулась с приввыной позы для сна на спину и осмотрела расфокусированым взглядом потолок. Место рядом с тобой было пустое, а простынь успела остыть. И только легкий аромат любимых духов Ванды едва чувствовался на подушке. "Странно, и почему она меня не разбудила? Опять срочное задание?.." Окончательно …
❤3
Ану быстренько в кровать. Ты видела время? А с утра дела, просыпаться рано надо. Так что пошли спать
Солнце, прости, что опять убежала на долгое время. Уже завтра всё узнаешь, а пока секрет)
Ладно, давай понемногу оживать. Не все же воскресенье проводить в кровати, да и обед пора приготовить
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dearwanda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,369,343 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dearwanda named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍷Dear Wanda🌷” (@dearwanda), 42 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dearwanda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.