Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DeafTV

@deaftv24

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,770subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001887224229
TypeChannel
Username@deaftv24
Created6 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deaftv24

Growth

17,77017,81317,791.56 August 2026 — 17,806 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,807 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,812 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,813 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,800 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,787 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,785 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,770 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,764–17,819 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:3417,770-15
12 Aug 2026, 04:3717,785-2
11 Aug 2026, 05:5617,787-13
10 Aug 2026, 07:2717,800-13
9 Aug 2026, 08:5117,813+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:0217,812+5
7 Aug 2026, 09:2817,807+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:2217,806no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:3117,806first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.48%
avg views ÷ 17,770 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held45 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total59,791
Reactions total1,477
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27m 04s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 33 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,477 reactions across 45 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍73950.0%
28819.5%
🔥1439.68%
😁795.35%
🤯573.86%
🥰342.30%
👏312.10%
😨312.10%
231.56%
🤩171.15%
👀161.08%
💯60.406%
🙏60.406%
🍾50.339%
🎉10.068%
🤷10.068%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,477reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC529 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🧳 🚕 Новые правила перевозки багажа и животных в такси начнут действовать в России с сентября. 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #новыезаконы

7👍5

12 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC737 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

💸 Россияне могут «обменять» подарочную карту на деньги, заявили в Госдуме. 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #новыезаконы

👍1132

12 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC827 views9 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

СКАЧАТЬ ИГРУ БЕСПЛАТНО

🔥52👏2

11 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC≈1,090 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🇨🇳 В Китае появилось первое в мире безосевое колесо обозрения! Гигантская конструкция высотой 145 метров установлена прямо на мосту через реку Байланг. 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #путешествие

👍18👀73🥰3

11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,120 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 🧹 Роботизированная уборщица Робот Somatic можно «нанять» на месяц за 1000 долларов и он будет наводить порядки у вас по 40 часов в неделю. 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #технологии

👍162🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC≈1,140 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Малина 🤩 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #ягода

👍2342🔥2🤩1

10 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,050 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @nikitkodeaffinancePhoto

Что ваш ребенок знает о деньгах? Проверьте за минуту. Переходи по ссылке тут 👉 https://t.me/+ERwMUECFfddkM2My

👍115💯4

10 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,130 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Лайфхаки с бумажными полотенцами на кухне. Вика Валевич Телеграм Вика Валевич МАХ 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #блогеры #лайфхак

👍295🔥4

10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈1,080 views28 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Autodesk представил инструменты, где можно записать движение человека, превратить его в движение 💬 МАХ | 💬 ТЕЛЕГРАМ #ИИ

🔥17😁63👍2

10 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,060 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @poslushayte_festPhoto

🫢🩵 Инклюзивный благотворительный фестиваль «Послушайте!» — пространство о культуре, репрезентации и гордости сообщества глухих и слабослышащих людей. Он открыт не только для сообщества глухих, но и для каждого, кто хочет познакомиться с миром глухих и увидеть его без мифов и стереотипов. Мы показываем, что глухие и слабослышащие люди могут быть совершенно разные. Каждая история, способ коммуникации и жизненный опыт

8👍4🔥4

10 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC978 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

13👏3🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC970 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Завтра на вебинаре вы получите в подарок 🎁 ИГРУ «СЕМЕЙНЫЙ ФИНАНСОВЫЙ КВЕСТ» приходите на бесплатный вебинар «ФИНАНСОВОЕ БУДУЩЕЕ РЕБЕНКА» 11 августа в 19:00 по МСК Ссылка на вебинар будет тут👉 https://t.me/+ERwMUECFfddkM2My

5🔥4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @deaftv24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 12,242 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DeafTV” (@deaftv24), 17,770 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deaftv24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.