Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сверхдержава | Дедович

@deadowitch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

421subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001242392399
TypeChannel
Username@deadowitch
Created4 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deadowitch

Growth

4214234226 Aug 2026, 11:45 — 423 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 423 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:58 — 421 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 11:456 Aug 2026, 23:58
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 421–423 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:58421-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:31423no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45423first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.8%
avg views ÷ 421 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,263
Reactions total263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

263 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54021503409570619567428.1%
5420.5%
custom 51972675933453853273613.7%
👍207.60%
🦄207.60%
🔥176.46%
😁114.18%
💯83.04%
🌚72.66%
🤗31.14%
🫡31.14%
custom 521307479098157507220.76%
custom 526246785548342367320.76%
20.76%
😎20.76%
🤝20.76%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deadowitch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC51 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#спросидедовича Спрашивали: Серёжа, поехали жить в Калининград? Отвечаю: Значит, твоя афера с онлайн-казино удалась, и ты готова меня обеспечивать до конца моих дней, ничего не требуя взамен? Наконец-то. Но мне нужно подумать. Я собирался баллотироваться в мэры. Ноль вопросов на очереди, спрашивай здесь.

🦄2custom 51972675933453853272

5 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC73 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дал комментарий Коммерсантъ FM об использовании ИИ при написании книг и про наш знак «Написано человеком». Послушать и прочитать можно здесь.

custom 54021503409570619565🦄21

3 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC105 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Маленький рюкзачок террора Охранник метро как обычно увидел во мне опасность: борода, тёмные очки, татуировки на руках, лямки рюкзака. Охранник смотрел с явным намерением отправить мой маленький рюкзачок террора на досмотр, ещё не видя его и не зная его сущности. Разгадав его намерения, я пошёл в другую сторону — якобы пополнить карту метрополитена, тем предоставляя охраннику увидеть сущность моего маленького рюкза

3🦄2custom 54021503409570619562

3 Aug 2026, 07:43 UTC102 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ненавистникам ИИ-творцов. Чем больше вы собачитесь между собой, тем большее пространство роста даёте тотальному контролю. Раздор между нациями, полами, классами — всё это разделение, чтобы властвовать. Давайте, сделайте подарок властолюбцам, передеритесь ещё всем миром из-за использования/неиспользования ИИ.

👍4custom 54021503409570619564custom 51972675933453853273

3 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC100 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#спросидедовича Спрашивали: Почему вы воспринимаете слова любящей ваш медийный образ женщины как лесть в конце её обращения к вам? Отвечаю: Лесть в конце тоннеля. Не лесть — милая лесть. Это не то же самое. Любящие осознанно или нет льстят любимым, не вижу в этом ничего предосудительного. Милая льстица, кстати, деанонимизировалась и написала мне в личку. Пишу это, подозревая, что сегодняшний вопрос тоже написала

custom 51972675933453853276🔥4🌚3

2 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC95 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#спросидедовича Спрашивали: Сегодня осознав на секунду момент своего существования, захотелось вам напомнить и сообщить, что я вас по прежнему люблю. Особенно приятно думать эту мысль в выходной...) в городе висит дурацкая дымка и мне кажется нас травят рептилойды...или как их там...ну крч явно дышится похуже чем было. Не знаю. Надо ли писать это в эту рубрику. Вопрос то я не придумала... Сегодня я на своем балконе

custom 5197267593345385327125😎2

1 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC101 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Однако пишущие и админящие нужны — и пусть явятся. Редакция трудится над сохранением Чтива и РД без выходных и ночей, под златом солнца и серебром луны. Темнейшие времена плавной нисходяги, где конца кризиса не было видно, уже прошли, что-то срастается, становится видно, из каких краёв и как придут деньги и возможности. Но мы готовы к тому, что никогда не будет легче. Поток желающих приобщиться есть, но 90% из них от

3🔥2🦄21👍1custom 54021503409570619561

31 Jul 2026, 21:55 UTC112 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вы пишете в чат предложения, что нужно делать, росомахи. Но мы знаем, что нужно делать. В РД больше идей и планов, чем мы можем выполнить имеющимся составом. Не хватает только тех, кто делает. Поэтому — занимайтесь своими делами. Продавайте свой труд корпорациям или малому бизнесу. Бездельничайте, если можете себе позволить. Путешествуйте. Любите друг друга. Читайте книги или смотрите рилзы. Доминируйте или подчиняйт

6custom 54021503409570619565🔥3🦄1

30 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC133 views13 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

О разидентификации Вкус вещества и его действие — это форма и содержание, это одно и то же. У воды нет вкуса. Нет формы. Но — нет ничего важнее воды. Поэтому я отказываюсь от самоидентификации. Позволяю себе быть между всем, быть проводником всего. И этот отказ не значит, что в нужный момент я не могу самоидентифицироваться локально как, например, мультидисциплинарный продюсер и концептолог, а потом разидентифициров

👍3💯3🦄3custom 54021503409570619563custom 51972675933453853271

30 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC122 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Когда у меня будет транснациональная корпорация с армией, не удивляйтесь, но помните: я этого не хотел.

🤝2custom 51972675933453853272custom 540215034095706195621🌚1🦄1🫡1😁1

29 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC150 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итак, как писал выше, перестал себя идентифицировать как писателя. Потому что зачем? Я написал несколько книг, лучших, на которые был способен. Отношение знакомых и незнакомцев, которое я получаю к себе через эти книги, вполне даёт понять, что мне удалось транслировать нечто уникальное и ценное. Однако издатели-монополисты этим не интересуются, они интересуются прибылью и безопасностью. Я принял от Сергея Иннера и

custom 540215034095706195694🤗3🫡2custom 52624678554834236732👍1💯1🦄1

29 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC131 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кстати, об опережении времени. Наши книги продолжают получать респекты от крупных литературных премий. В этот раз «Виски Сауэр» Размика Кочаряна в шорт-листе «Ясной поляны». Отправил ссылку даме из Яндекс.Книг, с кем общался выше (история здесь). Она ничего не ответила. Подождём. Мы же никуда не торопимся, верно?

custom 540215034095706195675👍2😁2💯1🦄1custom 51972675933453853271

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @deadowitch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,486 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сверхдержава | Дедович” (@deadowitch), 421 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deadowitch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.