Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Deadlock Neywann

Channel

Deadlock Neywann

@deadlock_neywann

Not marked by Telegram, checked 24 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002176444303
TypeChannel
Username@deadlock_neywann
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/deadlock_neywann

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20320520413 September 2026 — 205 subscribers13 September 2026 — 205 subscribers14 September 2026 — 204 subscribers28 September 2026 — 203 subscribers13 September 202628 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 203–205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 20:19203-1
14 Sept 2026, 12:17204-1
13 Sept 2026, 09:22205no change
13 Sept 2026, 08:47205first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.8%
avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held19 (5 February 2026 – 4 September 2026)
Views total97
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3560.3%
👍712.1%
🔥610.3%
😎610.3%
😁23.45%
👎11.72%
🥰11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 15:41 UTC97 views9 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Система 50/50 так хорошо работает, что Йоши решил не пускать к врагам 6 игрока, чтобы мы выиграли.

❤4👍3🔥2

21 Mar 2026, 20:29 UTC572 views6 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Через пацифиста на Мид боссе

❤6

15 Feb 2026, 13:46 UTC687 viewsread 13 September 2026
Poll

Какой у вас ранг?

  1. Послушник/искатель6%
  2. Алхимик4%
  3. Чародей4%
  4. Ритуалист8%
  5. Эмиссар17%
  6. Архонт12%
  7. Оракул12%
  8. Фантом12%
  9. Аскедант12%
  10. Этернус12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Feb 2026, 09:21 UTC555 views8 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Apollo это пздц, герою точно будут фиксить 3 скилл🤩

❤7👎1

13 Feb 2026, 21:47 UTC499 views2 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Только вышла и Еши уже уирает героя

😎2

13 Feb 2026, 21:46 UTC472 views3 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

Cелеста? Пошла отсюда

😎3

12 Feb 2026, 21:59 UTC322 viewsread 13 September 2026

Очень хочу уже посмотреть на него

10 Feb 2026, 15:50 UTC343 viewsread 13 September 2026

Вау вау вау😄😄😄 Герой просто солнышко, как я и думал. Для меня она куда интереснее венатора того же. Уже успел на ней поиграть, и чувствую, что еë 3 это сок, Поскольку кд у зарядов 2 секунды или полторы)) 🤩 PS: почему на неё нельзя сплит шот?

9 Feb 2026, 22:12 UTC319 views1 reactionsread 13 September 2026

Точно кстати не ульта Лича из доты

🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @deadlock_neywann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Feb 2026, 13:46 UTCAnonymous Poll156 voters

Какой у вас ранг?

  1. Послушник/искатель6%
  2. Алхимик4%
  3. Чародей4%
  4. Ритуалист8%
  5. Эмиссар17%
  6. Архонт12%
  7. Оракул12%
  8. Фантом12%
  9. Аскедант12%
  10. Этернус12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DEADLOCK ONE — новости Deadlock / Valve
@deadlockrf · 26,151
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Deadlock Neywann” (@deadlock_neywann), 203 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deadlock_neywann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.