Channel
@deabiedi
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
230subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001415258579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deabiedi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deabiedi |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 230 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 224 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 221 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:10 | 221 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 220 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 January 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 239 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 83.3% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔷بررسی گزارش تیر 1405 گروه #محصولات_دارویی 🔷 نمادها بر اساس درصد تغییر فروش 4 ماهه 1405 به 4 ماهه 1404 به ترتیب آورده شده اند. اعداد به میلیارد تومان 🌐 تحلیل بازار سهام
❤2
🔷 مدنیزاده: شیوه فعلی قیمتگذاری دارو پاسخگو نیست* ✅یکی از صریحترین مواضع یکصدوسیوهفتمین نشست دیروز شورای گفتوگوی دولت و بخش خصوصی، *انتقاد وزیر اقتصاد از مدل فعلی قیمتگذاری دارو* بود. ✅مدنیزاده با بیان اینکه روش موجود، حقوق تولیدکنندگان را به طور کامل تأمین نمیکند، گفت: وزارت بهداشت و سازمان غذا و دارو باید با مشارکت بخش خصوصی، *سازوکاری منطقیتر برای تعیین قیمت دارو طراحی کنند*؛ مدلی که ضمن حفظ توان تولیدک…
❤2
🔷بررسی وضعیت بنیادی صنعت دارو 🌐علی اسکینی
❤2
⚡️بررسی وضعیت بنیادی #دعبید 👤 علی اسکینی ㅤ داروسازی دکتر عبیدی در گزارش ۶ ماهه حدود ۵.۳ همت سود خالص ساخته که نسبت به سود حدود ۱.۶ همتی دوره مشابه، رشد سنگین حدود ۲۳۰ درصدی را نشان میدهد. فروش شرکت نیز با رشد حدود ۱۱۸ درصدی از محدوده ۶.۱ همت به بیش از ۱۳.۲ همت رسیده است. روند فصل دوم نیز قویتر شده؛ فروش شرکت با رشد حدود ۴۸ درصدی نسبت به فصل قبل به حدود ۷.۹ همت و سود خالص با رشد حدود ۵۰ درصدی به محدوده ۳.۲ همت رسی…
❤1
🔷تحلیل پیشرفته گزارش های حسابرسی صنعت دارو 🌐دکتر سیاوش افتخاری
🔷بررسی گزارشهای ماهانه گروه محصولات دارویی* 🔷 اعداد به میلیارد تومان میباشد و نمادها بر اساس درصد تغییر دو ماهه 1405 به دو ماهه 1404 رتبهبندی شدهاند. 🌐 تحلیل بازار بورس ایران
❤3
✅ رابطه ارز ترجیحی و گرانی دارو 🔷 همایون سامهیح نجف آبادی عضو کمیسیون بهداشت و درمان مجلس: تا زمانی که ارز ترجیحی در اختیار تولیدکنندگان قرار نگیرد، ناچارند از ارز آزاد استفاده کنند و این امر باعث تاثیر مستقیم بر قیمت دارو و سایر فرآوردههای سلامتمحور میشود. 🔷 بر اساس قانون اگر ارز ترجیحی برای تولید دارو یا سایر فرآورده های سلامت محور تامین نشود و تولیدکننده با کمبود مواجه شود از ارز آزاد برای تولید استفاده می…
🔴 ارز ۲۸۵۰۰ دارو فعلاً سر جایش است 🔷حسین تاجیک مدیر اداره تخصیص ارز بانک مرکزی امروز در اتاق بازرگانی تهران: نرخ ارز ۲۸۵۰۰ تومانی برای دارو و تجهیزات پزشکی همچنان پابرجا خواهد بود و دولت تا زمان حصول اطمینان از عدم بروز اختلال در زنجیره تامین این اقلام حیاتی، برنامهای برای حذف این نرخ ندارد 🔷درباره اختلاف نرخ ارز ترجیحی و نرخ بازار و فشاری که ممکن است به واردکنندگان وارد شود حل آن صرفا در اختیار بانک مرکزی نیست. م…
🔷سی و پنجمین میز صنعت: صنعت دارو دی ماه 1404 🌐اداره میزهای صنعت و رتبه بندی ناشران سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار 📈@tahlildaro
تحلیل وبررسی الگوی احتمالی تغییر نرخ ارز بر صنعت دارو دی ماه ۱۴۰۴ 🌐انتخاب اول 📈@tahlildaro
🔷 بررسی وضعیت مقدار و مبلغ تأمین دارو در سال 1404 🟣میزان تأمین دارو در آذر 1404: 6 میلیارد دارو ◀️رشد 9 درصدی به نسبت آبان ماه ◀️رشد 38 درصدی به نسبت میانگین 1403 🟣میزان تأمین دارو در نه ماهه 1404: 44.3 میلیارد دارو 🟣تأمین مقداری 98.7 درصد دارو توسط تولید داخل 🟣تأمین مبلغی 83.7 درصد دارو توسط تولید داخل 🟣شرکت های بورسی تأمین 57 درصد مقدار و 36 درصد مبلغ داروی داخلی 🟣#دعبید، #دارو، #دالبر، #ددانا و #دلر بزرگترین ش…
موج جدید افزایش قیمت دارو در راه است 🔹 سیدسجاد حسینی کارشناس و تحلیلگر حوزه دارو نوشت: به زودی اثرات افزایش قیمت نهادههای پتروشیمی در محصولات دارویی خود را نشان میدهد، دستکم افزایش ۵۳ درصدی قیمتهای پایه
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @deabiedi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 39,795 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داروسازی دکتر عبیدی ( سهامداران دعبید)” (@deabiedi), 230 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deabiedi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.