Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🚬𝑪𝒓𝒖𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒂'𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒓𝒚 ¦ 𝑫𝒆 𝑽𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒑☕️

Channel

🚬𝑪𝒓𝒖𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒂'𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒓𝒚 ¦ 𝑫𝒆 𝑽𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒑☕️

@de_ville_cosp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001703930431
TypeChannel
Username@de_ville_cosp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/de_ville_cosp

Growth

151152151.57 August 2026 — 151 subscribers8 August 2026 — 151 subscribers14 August 2026 — 152 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:37152+1
8 Aug 2026, 19:46151no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:03151first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.0%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (12 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,939
Reactions total440
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 59s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

603 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524458046345185889718530.7%
custom 52449770564370041689115.1%
custom 52446704816714179038113.4%
custom 52448181383520853728013.3%
custom 5454113312025380968416.80%
custom 5244476121516368917355.80%
custom 5194966208134259559203.32%
custom 5465124508660678630152.49%
custom 5244855070775863727142.32%
custom 5413793627929328485121.99%
custom 5465536108261553861121.99%
🔥101.66%
🍓71.16%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 603reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @de_ville_cosp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC45 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Раскайфовка прошла успешно, поясница не болит, поэтому сегодня автор принёс вам одно красивое фото 🛐 Завтра пилю контент. ⚖️

custom 524458046345185889713custom 52449770564370041686custom 52446704816714179035

5 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC69 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Так, дети, папа уезжает в ебеня на пару дней чтобы восстановить менталку с друзьяшками и снять спазм в пояснице. Приеду - нафоткаю вам контента и сделаю пару анонсов. Не балуйтесь тут. ☕️

custom 524458046345185889721custom 524497705643700416810custom 52444761215163689177custom 52448181383520853722

4 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC87 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну все побежали и я побежал... Давайте, девочки мальчики, газ

custom 52446704816714179032

4 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lunamoonshade

👽🧦™️🦄🛼🥑🐈™️🪀🍷 Представь, что мы делаем с тобой парный косплей. Кого будем делать и почему? 👁 Или кем ты меня видишь в пару к уже своему сделанному образу? 😇

custom 52446704816714179032

1 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC124 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nanamivnatutPhoto

done!🔵

custom 524458046345185889716custom 524497705643700416811custom 52444761215163689177

31 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTC138 views63 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эстетичные коллажи, видимо, вас не впечатляют.... Не хотите по-хорошему, придётся по-плохому.🥀 #jujutsukaisen #NanamiKento

custom 524481813835208537229custom 524458046345185889717custom 524467048167141790316custom 52449770564370041681

28 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC158 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Тери передала мне эстафету, так что ловите~🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 суть эстафеты: ~создать коллаж с ассоциациями любимого косплея. шаблон в комментариях Передаю эстафету: 🖤 Capralmeow 🖤 Eric 🖤 Cody 🖤 Meloki

custom 524458046345185889717custom 524497705643700416811custom 52444761215163689177custom 52448181383520853723

26 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @krechet_workshopVideo

Друзья, видео о пожаре в нашей мастерской, который случился позавчера😒 Ссылки на сбор: https://messenger.online.sberbank.ru/sl/rjJ4sI3vm9cS6ZVnN https://www.tbank.ru/cf/6OFl7pCVtlL

custom 52445804634518588975

26 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC146 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чуваки, брательник мой там чуть не угарел Если у кого-то есть возможность помочь и поддержать ребят в трудное время, заранее огромное вам спасибо 💖

custom 52449770564370041686custom 52445804634518588974custom 52448550707758637271

25 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC164 views54 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

POV: приходишь в юридическую фирму на встречу со своим адвокатом и видишь его. Твои действия? ⚖️ #jujutsukaisen #hiromihiguruma

custom 524458046345185889721custom 524481813835208537218custom 524467048167141790312custom 52448550707758637273

23 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC168 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, газ

custom 524458046345185889716custom 52446704816714179039custom 52449770564370041688

22 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC172 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🖤🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🖤 🖤🖤🖤🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ ⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪ 𝓣𝓮𝓪𝓬𝓱 𝓶𝓮 𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓽𝓸 𝓵𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓘'𝓶 𝓪𝓼𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝔂𝓸𝓾 𝓽𝓸 𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴 𝓶𝔂 𝓱𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓽 𝓲𝓷 𝓱𝓪𝓵𝓯 𝓓𝓻𝓪𝓰 𝓶𝓮 𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 𝓽𝓸 𝓗𝓮𝓵𝓵 𝓢𝓸 𝓘 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓴𝓷𝓸𝔀 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓗𝓮𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓷 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝔀𝓮𝓵𝓵 ⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪⛪ 🕯Ph — Rometse 😒Sebastian 🕯️Help — capralmeow & red fury #blackbutler #cielphantomhive #sebastianmichaelis

custom 524497705643700416819custom 524485507077586372710custom 52446704816714179038custom 52448181383520853723custom 52445804634518588972custom 52444761215163689171

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @de_ville_cosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 217,907 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🚬𝑪𝒓𝒖𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒂'𝒔 𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒓𝒚 ¦ 𝑫𝒆 𝑽𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒑☕️” (@de_ville_cosp), 152 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/de_ville_cosp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.