Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ||ПЕРЕРЫВ|| мёртвые души. 🦕

Channel

||ПЕРЕРЫВ|| мёртвые души. 🦕

@de4d_sou18

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

181subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002381186333
TypeChannel
Username@de4d_sou18
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/de4d_sou18

Growth

181182181.515 Aug 2026, 07:19 — 182 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 182 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 08:37 — 181 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 07:1916 Aug 2026, 08:37
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 181–182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:37181-1
15 Aug 2026, 07:30182no change
15 Aug 2026, 07:19182first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 181 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.8
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
31.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held14 (12 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total333
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
27s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53620239862239493311634.8%
custom 5251602786520434536715.2%
custom 5440759395413673327715.2%
custom 5436031117457133039613.0%
custom 6089203760943340912613.0%
custom 539565302610082310748.70%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC20 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026

С завтрашнего дня мне придется взять небольшой перерыв, т.к придется уехать. 🦖На ваших каналах постараюсь быть актвным и тут по возможности что-то выпускать, спасибо за понимание. 🦖

custom 53620239862239493312custom 60892037609433409122custom 53956530261008231071custom 54360311174571330391

14 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC23 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Еще дроп с утра 🫂

custom 53620239862239493315custom 54407593954136733273custom 53956530261008231071

14 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC22 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Ему так идет👍👍👍👍👍

custom 53620239862239493313custom 60892037609433409122

13 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC24 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Мой коментарий не нужен

custom 52516027865204345362custom 54407593954136733271custom 60892037609433409121

13 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC21 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌟 : t.me/de4d_sou18ㅤ 𓂃 ׁׅ݊ 𓈄֯ ᝰ - н𐐼зв𐐼ние к𐐼н𐐼л𐐼: 9/10 мне очень нрав ᝰ - юз: 9/10 хороший ᝰ - 𐐫пис𐐼ние: 8/10 спасибо ᝰ - 𐐼в𐐼т𐐼рк𐐼: 10/10 скз любимые ᝰ - любимый пост: t.me/de4d_sou18/10467 ТЭСИИ ᝰ - в цел𐐫м: 8/10 песня: I do - skz

12 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC29 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

И групповые ещеее☺️

custom 52516027865204345363custom 53620239862239493313custom 54360311174571330393custom 54407593954136733273

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @de4d_sou18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,498,165 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“||ПЕРЕРЫВ|| мёртвые души. 🦕” (@de4d_sou18), 181 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/de4d_sou18.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.