Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

蝌蚪频道-点亮曝光

@dds2288

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

251subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537112307
TypeChannel
Username@dds2288
Description❇️广告商务合作 : @yuji66
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dds2288

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bbb677/1824421 Jun 2024, 04:21 UTC@dds2288/18166 · this entry21 Jun 2024, 04:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@bbb677/1824521 Jun 2024, 04:21 UTC@dds2288/18167 · this entry21 Jun 2024, 04:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@dds2288/18168 · this entry22 Jun 2024, 06:00 UTC@bbb677/1824622 Jun 2024, 06:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@dds2288/18169 · this entry22 Jun 2024, 06:00 UTC@bbb677/1824722 Jun 2024, 06:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@bbb677/1825123 Jun 2024, 04:30 UTC@dds2288/18173 · this entry23 Jun 2024, 04:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@dds2288/18174 · this entry23 Jun 2024, 18:21 UTC@bbb677/1825223 Jun 2024, 18:21 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bbb67714 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bbb677 (104)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 June 2024 to 27 June 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @bbb677. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2517 Aug 2026, 04:37 — 251 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:47 — 251 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:377 Aug 2026, 04:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:47251no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:37251first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
15,300
Videos
2
Links
1,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2024, 07:50 UTC279 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

必威黑钱1w,在英超赞助那么多球队,全世界都运营的平台,没想到现在也开始黑钱了。 我六七年的玩家了,有两年没在必威玩,前两天回归充值了1000,没领任何优惠活动,只下注了两单NBA,然后提款被审核,今天告知我违规。 我不明白玩NBA会有什么原因违规的。 大家注意点 不要玩必威了,随随便便就说你违规,和野鸡台有什么区别 # 曝光 #骗子 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

27 Jun 2024, 07:50 UTC390 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿 #金届支付 #黑我30万 我是料主,在他公群,然后他拉我进私群,公群把我踢了 3月11号,叫卡150万入金,已经问过他,是不是一卡接150万, 然后,他说50万保30万,是一卡接 第一笔进了59万,他刷黄金刷了,然后又进了90多万, 天眼余额,钱被他全部刷完了! 给我下发了110万,还有30万不下发 拖了5天,昨天说给我下发一半 今天。直接说不给了! 重点。他是刷黄金,在商场买金,银行卡的记录流水显示钱,全部刷完了! 在商场万象城刷黄金,说30万没有拿到黄金,扯淡 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

26 Jun 2024, 19:42 UTC247 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

买了我一个飞机号,一开始说要支付宝口令包给我付款,后来又说不行,有要给u,又说买了u给我,又说冻结三日,第二天又跟我说号被封了,两个福建人,前些天还来濮阳找他们朋友了,在国内做诈骗,还做红娘拉人头生意,认识他的,避雷! 骗子用户:@wsI88 #曝光 #骗子 #此人注意 #同行避雷 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

26 Jun 2024, 15:22 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

曝光 骗子 控股集团 然后网站关闭了 钱不给 还把我踢出频道 骗子飞机@GHQQ7 骗人说网址关闭了 然后不给补 合作这么久了5000都骗 希望有和此人合作的擦亮眼睛 迟早有一天被他骗 下图是此人频道和飞机 #曝光 #骗子 #控股集团 #同行避雷 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

26 Jun 2024, 15:22 UTC216 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

前几天凤凰体育的代理打电话拉我 说有彩金送 就来注册了 第一次充值了2000,玩的DB哈希极限跳伞 赢了1w 提款了 中间差不多一个星期我回开云玩 赢了差不多10多w 也是玩的极限跳伞 都出款了 第二次来凤凰体育充值了2000 运气好赢了5w 到我要提款的时候 在线客服先是要我提供各种资料 什么手持账单之类的 这些我都按照他们的要求提供了 回复就是需要审核7天 到今天为止代理就开始说我不是正常玩家 最后说我玩游戏有手法 冻结了我账号 有没有违规你们查不出来?就玩了你们平台的极限跳伞一种游戏 大家一定擦亮眼睛 平台地址我都发给大家看看 懂得都懂 黑平台 千万别去 现在平台都开始黑本金了 凤凰体育给我个说法。 #曝光 #黑平台 #FH体育 #凤凰体育 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

25 Jun 2024, 20:28 UTC182 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

这个狗杂种在kk 卖给我们几千u的号 又喊我们预定了几千u的号 卖给我们的号 后面全部被找回了 全部加起来差我们100多个号 全部都几十u一个的 后面又出来一批新号 想卖给我们 做收割 狗杂种有号卖 没有号补 预定的号 钱付了也不给我们 这个烂杂种 一让他补号 把我们预定的号给我们 就找这种理由 那种理由 不给我们号 到现在已经过去半个月了 在这之前我们还相信他 认为他会回来给我们号 狗日的现在直接不管了 上线了 也不回复 他妈的 死全家的玩意 这个狗杂种 真的人渣 那这些钱给他全家买棺材 骗子飞机1:@LinkedIn_Ke 骗子飞机2:@Man_6868 骗子频道:https://t.me/Kuakechuhai_Nj 骗子地址:TKYS7ksfVBUw8uSuHrBd2DxXKTwAgqzcgX #曝光 #骗子 #话家号商 #同行避雷 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告

25 Jun 2024, 14:15 UTC143 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

一开始六点开始上的课到七点,他说是秒上秒结账,到了10点30分说给结了,我就转出去看了一眼,再回来直接拉黑,那个押的也是一样的上来让交50u,直接自导自演 骗子用户: @puaii 骗子频道:https://t.me/xyxyxinyu #曝光 #骗子 #手机口 #同行避雷 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

25 Jun 2024, 14:15 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

爆光这组骗子求职,前几天在求职群看到阿猫的求职消息。然后联系到他。阿猫讲总共讲九个人,赔付3万美金。 他讲他是带头的,这边给他安排好的岗位薪资待遇都是较好的。 这边公司担心赔付钱交了。人中途跑了。所以跟阿猫讲,先让他过来。交他一个人的。一开始讲九人平摊算赔付。之后阿猫又讲,他与他老板刀哥商量过了,他算是带头的,所以平摊到的赔付算的会高些,3500u。我们也是出于信任没有多说什么。直到今天傍晚3500u交了机票也买了,还给了些零钱让他用。我们安排人把阿猫接到了机场。也就是出于信任。我们让人把他送到机场,就没有叫人继续看着与跟着。在傍晚五点十几分的时候。消息就已经不会再回,电话就不会再接。这边只想说为了25500左右的钱以求职的方式去行骗很没有必要。来公司做事一个月只要聪明点,都不止赚这点钱。希望你好自为之。这边公司没有想追究此事,但个人心里不舒服所以将此事曝光。这边会曝光到每个曝光频道。让你们俩也好好长长脸 @Fulilaozh

24 Jun 2024, 19:13 UTC132 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

曝光死妈黑台子壹号娱乐,我打到了10多个W不让我下分,申请下分一直不通过,然后我的钱包归零了,号也没了,全被黑掉了!之前玩那么久几千几W还是可以提,打到10多个就黑了 真厉害!黑台子链接🔗 12yhp.top #曝光 #黑平台 #壹号娱乐 #避雷 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

24 Jun 2024, 14:04 UTC91 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

必威黑钱1w,在英超赞助那么多球队,全世界都运营的平台,没想到现在也开始黑钱了。 我六七年的玩家了,有两年没在必威玩,前两天回归充值了1000,没领任何优惠活动,只下注了两单NBA,然后提款被审核,今天告知我违规。 我不明白玩NBA会有什么原因违规的。 大家注意点 不要玩必威了,随随便便就说你违规,和野鸡台有什么区别 # 曝光 #骗子 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

24 Jun 2024, 14:04 UTC111 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#群友投稿 #金届支付 #黑我30万 我是料主,在他公群,然后他拉我进私群,公群把我踢了 3月11号,叫卡150万入金,已经问过他,是不是一卡接150万, 然后,他说50万保30万,是一卡接 第一笔进了59万,他刷黄金刷了,然后又进了90多万, 天眼余额,钱被他全部刷完了! 给我下发了110万,还有30万不下发 拖了5天,昨天说给我下发一半 今天。直接说不给了! 重点。他是刷黄金,在商场买金,银行卡的记录流水显示钱,全部刷完了! 在商场万象城刷黄金,说30万没有拿到黄金,扯淡 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

23 Jun 2024, 18:21 UTC89 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

买了我一个飞机号,一开始说要支付宝口令包给我付款,后来又说不行,有要给u,又说买了u给我,又说冻结三日,第二天又跟我说号被封了,两个福建人,前些天还来濮阳找他们朋友了,在国内做诈骗,还做红娘拉人头生意,认识他的,避雷! 骗子用户:@wsI88 #曝光 #骗子 #此人注意 #同行避雷 ✍️新闻爆料联系: @baise69 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍️广告商务合作: @baise69

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dds2288. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“蝌蚪频道-点亮曝光” (@dds2288), 251 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dds2288.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.