Channel
@ddosrussiatogether
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
172subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001730242615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ddosrussiatogether |
| Description | A coordinnated effort to all work together and ddos one target at a time |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 4 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ddosrussiatogether |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 172 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 172 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
21 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 85.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2022 to 22 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
@grrwahrr has made a similar tool, if anyone want's to try it out: https://github.com/Grrwahrr/avtomat_dos/
👍5👎1
Also, a reporter reached out to me, if any of you are from the UK, dm me (@crakheads)
👍2
Analyzing the comments, we see a lot of questions about how to carry out attacks and what tools to use. For a long time we have been considering what technical solution to advise, because, of course, it should be a tool that can be trusted. During the selection of such a solution, much attention was paid to its simplicity and multiplatform. And finally we found such a solution - it is already used by a number of memb…
👍1
Аналізуючи коментарі ми спостерігаємо велику кількість питань про те, як проводити атаки і які засоби для цього потрібно використовувати. Досить тривалий час ми зважували, яке технічне рішення порадити, адже, безумовно, це має бути засіб, якому можна довіряти. Під час підбору такого рішення багато уваги приділялося його простоті та мультиплатформенності. І от нарешті ми таке рішення знайшли - воно вже використовуєтьс…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Also if any of ya'll are interested in joining a grey hat hacking group targeting scammers, let me know (@CH1LL3R)
👍4
Є інформація, що спостерігаються значні черги до банкоматів, але давайте їх збільшимо шляхом унеможливлення доступу до онлайн банків: — There are long queue to ATMs in Russia recently. Let’s make it even longer with shutting down online banking https://online.vtb.ru (185.179.146.43) https://online.sberbank.ru/CSAFront/index.do#/ (194.54.14.131) https://online.gpb.ru/login (195.225.39.107) https://alfabank.ru/everyda…
👍2
cmon ya'll, it was down for a second there, keep up the work, and those that aren't bombarding, get on it
👍1
Target open ports
Nmap here
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ddosrussiatogether. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@ddosrussiatogether named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“One Target Go - Save Ukraine” (@ddosrussiatogether), 172 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ddosrussiatogether.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.