Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗗𝗢𝗡'𝗧 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗘 ‌

Channel

𝗗𝗢𝗡'𝗧 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗘 ‌

@ddont_care

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

449subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003039247109
TypeChannel
Username@ddont_care
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ddont_care

Growth

449450449.57 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 450 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:02 — 450 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:33 — 449 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:328 Aug 2026, 23:33
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 449–450 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:33449-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:02450no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:32450first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 449 subscribers
Avg views / post
168
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (13 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,343
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

208 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54268634109795492873516.8%
custom 54313547484752895662913.9%
custom 54269077436319791192311.1%
custom 54292872457082755042210.6%
custom 5429165869932490780188.65%
custom 5431425276133258571178.17%
custom 5206426937521616154167.69%
custom 5427335376345770940125.77%
custom 5429122082740906577115.29%
custom 5431459107590647777104.81%
custom 5431762053108869267104.81%
custom 580292197279911611231.44%
custom 518821465698390645920.962%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 20 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ddont_care. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC186 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"وكلُّ ساقٍ سيُسقى بما سقى." 🤩 @ddont_care

custom 54269077436319791193custom 58029219727991161122custom 54268634109795492871custom 54291220827409065771custom 54291658699324907801custom 54292872457082755041custom 54313547484752895661custom 54314252761332585711

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

24 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC284 views23 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

أوقات كنت بتمنى الحلم اللي بحلمه يبقى حقيقة، بس دلوقتي بتمنى الحقيقة اللي أنا فيها تكون حلم . @ddont_care

custom 54313547484752895665custom 52064269375216161544custom 54268634109795492873custom 54291658699324907803custom 54269077436319791192custom 54273353763457709401custom 54291220827409065771custom 54292872457082755041

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

23 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC132 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ㅤㅤㅤ𓏺𓏺 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 .

23 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC133 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ما تحاولش تعمل مجهود مع حد معندوش إستعداد يحاول عشانك ولا حتى مقدر وجودك وعارف قيمتك .. اللى دايمًا أنت اللى بتسأل عليه، واللى دايمًا أنت اللى بتشتري خاطره، واللى دايمًا سايق التقل والدلال عليك كأنك ملك من أملاكه سيبوا وامشي وبناقص كل اللى ييجي منه، أساسًا مش بييجي من وراه حاجة غير تعب القلب وقلّة القيمة وأنت أغلى، وأكبر، وأهم، من إنك تجري وتهين نفسك لحد .

custom 54292872457082755042custom 54313547484752895662custom 54268634109795492871custom 54269077436319791191

Signed ㅤㅤㅤ𓏺𓏺 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 .

22 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC137 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ㅤㅤㅤ𓏺𓏺 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 .

22 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC138 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

فيه تراكمات محدش شايفها، وحروب صغيرة بتقوم جواك كل يوم من غير صوت، تحاول تبان كويس، تضحك، وتقول "أنا بخير"، بينما الحقيقة إنك تعبان من كل حاجة... من التفكير، ومن المحاولة، ومن إنك لازم تبقى قوي طول الوقت... وزي ما قال نجيب محفوظ: "آفة حارتنا النسيان".. لكن بعض الأوجاع لا ثنسى، إحنا بس بنتعلم إزاي نتحملها بصمت، وصدق دوستويفسكي لما قال: "الألم والوجع دائمًا حليفان للوعي العميق" ... يمكن مع الأيام تخف... لكن حاليًا كل ا

custom 54268634109795492873custom 54313547484752895663custom 54269077436319791191custom 54292872457082755041

Signed ㅤㅤㅤ𓏺𓏺 𝐑𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 .

22 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC119 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @n990rPhoto

♥️

custom 54273353763457709402custom 54291658699324907802custom 54269077436319791191

Signed . حوكشة ءالمنياوي

20 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC214 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 @ddont_care

custom 54268634109795492873custom 54273353763457709401custom 54292872457082755041custom 54313547484752895661

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

13 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC285 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ظنوا ان الطيبه ضعف فوضعت لهم قانون من يخطأ يدفع الثمن😶 🤩🤩🤩🤩 @ddont_care

custom 54268634109795492872custom 54269077436319791191custom 54273353763457709401custom 54291220827409065771custom 54313547484752895661custom 54314252761332585711

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

10 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC291 views12 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

اكتشفت طبع قاسي فيا اذا زعلت من حد بخليه يشك اني محبيتهوش اصلا "حركه اديها 10/1000" @ddont_care

custom 52064269375216161543custom 54268634109795492873custom 54269077436319791192custom 54273353763457709401custom 54291658699324907801custom 54292872457082755041custom 54314252761332585711

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

8 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC313 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

نيجي للحق انا كل مشاعرى مزيفه،صح بحب بدايتها بس انا متناقض و بدون مشاعر و اكبر همي نفسي. "يا سلام" @ddont_care

custom 54291658699324907804custom 51882146569839064592custom 54268634109795492871custom 54269077436319791191custom 54292872457082755041custom 54313547484752895661custom 54317620531088692671

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

1 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC438 views17 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

أنا بقيت أختار نفسي عشان محدش هيختارني زي ما أنا بختارهم . @ddont_care

custom 54314252761332585714custom 52064269375216161542custom 54268634109795492872custom 54269077436319791192custom 54313547484752895662custom 54317620531088692672custom 54291658699324907801custom 54292872457082755041

Signed MóŹα₲ › ⲂαŚHα

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ddont_care. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,707 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗗𝗢𝗡'𝗧 𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗘 ‌” (@ddont_care), 449 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ddont_care.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.