Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 星柠的小屋

Channel

星柠的小屋

@dddxiaowu8

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

147subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004450193769
TypeChannel
Username@dddxiaowu8
Description真诚留给同样真诚的人!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dddxiaowu8

Growth

14727 Sept 2026, 15:47 — 147 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 16:22 — 147 subscribers27 Sept 2026, 15:4727 Sept 2026, 16:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 16:22147no change
27 Sept 2026, 15:47147first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
188.2%
avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
Avg views / post
277
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held18 (21 September 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total4,426
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Videos
8
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
55s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 14:54 UTC107 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🎉 星柠 @MerkoEeshee4751 的优惠券福利 🎁 奖品清单 • 星柠的200元通用优惠券 × 1 • 星柠的口令红包🧧18元 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 金华义乌福利社 • 加入 金华义乌福利社-在榜老师 • 加入 江浙沪精选探花 • 加入 金华义乌福利社-公告频道 • 加入 星柠的小屋 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗:10撒币 • 祝福上限:无上限次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号,提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福:支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 抽选时刻 • 2026-10-01 23:59:00 📜 抽奖说明 开奖三日内有效 老师问题可延期 转赠需要老师同意 ✨ 愿命运之剑指引你们前行,直至胜利之光照耀每一个人。

27 Sept 2026, 11:18 UTC189 viewsread 27 September 2026

【金华义乌福利社】@yiwugo 【评价时间】:2026-09-27 【老师名字】:星柠 @MerkoEeshee4751 【验证留名】:nika 【人照颜值】:9.5 【身材点评】: 身材比例很好 瘦且有胸 【老师类型】:呆呆的 女友感 【相处感受】: 性格很好,人照一致,相处起来很自然,老师任很好,不催,很会顾及别人的感受!在金华能找到这么好的老师也是第一次了,运气好 【交通便利】:很方便 【过程描述】: 和老师约好,遥控上楼,位置比较隐蔽,进门就问要不要喝水,然后聊了一会,洗完澡步入正题,老师配合的很好,过程很舒服 很满意!还会二刷! 【总结】:真的不错,推荐ly们去体验下,这个价格也是活菩萨了 最新半价、白嫖福利:https://t.me/yiwutongzhi/245

27 Sept 2026, 07:43 UTC211 viewsread 27 September 2026

【金华义乌福利社】@yiwugo 【评价时间】:2026-09-27 【老师名字】:星柠 @MerkoEeshee4751 【验证留名】:fygy 【人照颜值】:人照9分,颜值和照片一致 【身材点评】: 【老师类型】: 【相处感受】: 老师很热情,非常主动 【交通便利】:门口停车位多,比较方便 【过程描述】: 开门老师就很热情的邀请我洗澡,进来美滋滋😘,抱着老师的细腰,闲聊之后开始服务,从上到下,个别要求老师也很配合,先女上,之后感觉来了直接传教士,123结束,之后热情给个冰水美美聊天。 【总结】:9分辣妹,下次还会回炉,非常热情! 最新半价、白嫖福利:https://t.me/yiwutongzhi/245

24 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC345 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

⭐总频道⭐ ⭐朋友圈 ⭐报告榜 ⭐课表 ⭐联系方式 @MerkoEeshee4751 ⭐机器人 @xingnindeybot

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dddxiaowu8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“星柠的小屋” (@dddxiaowu8), 147 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dddxiaowu8.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.