Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

daan

@dddupaRRk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

77subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002532036405
TypeChannel
Username@dddupaRRk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dddupaRRk

Growth

7711 Aug 2026, 18:02 — 77 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 07:17 — 77 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 18:0212 Aug 2026, 07:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 76–78 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:1777no change
11 Aug 2026, 18:0277first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
47s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5249414251575002577650.0%
custom 5194949861488731994433.3%
custom 542478464680830538118.33%
❤‍🔥18.33%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 14:22 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @daanyme

РОЗЫГРЫШ 🎰 1 место - 100 рублей 2 место - 100 рублей 3 место - 100 рублей условия:переслать в свой тгк и быть подписчиком тгк итоги завтра в 10 утра

11 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @TechTeamProPhoto

🛴 Мирон Безбородов — в основе! Финал в Лужниках стал решающим. Там Мирон показал всё, на что способен, и мы не могли оставить это без внимания. С сегодняшнего дня Мирон — райдер основного состава TechTeam Pro. Его результаты на говорят сами за себя. 🙌 📱 miron_be_ 📱 https://t.me/miron_be_v2 #МиронБезбородов #Лужники #TechteamPro

11 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026

не смогу ниче в казани сделать руку в первый же день сильно отбил

10 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @birthdaycountbot

До вашего дня рождения осталась 1 неделя

7 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC53 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @birthdaycountbot

До вашего дня рождения осталось 10 дней

22 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC106 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

морозов тик ток создал я в ахуе

custom 51949498614887319943

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dddupaRRk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 726,253 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“daan” (@dddupaRRk), 77 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dddupaRRk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.