Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dragon Ball Confession

@dbconfession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004478718008
TypeChannel
Username@dbconfession
Created4 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dbconfession

Growth

98 August 2026 — 9 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9 subscribers8 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:019no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:489first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
273.7%
avg views ÷ 9 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.6
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held16 (4 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total271
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
12
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
457.1%
🔥228.6%
🌚114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @xigerisconfessionPhoto

ۤ ꉹㅤℐɴᴛᴇʀᴇ𝓈ᴛᴇᴅ in such character 𑄙s ︩︪ 𝗫𝗶𝗴𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀 ? ꒱ ︵ֺ᷼⏜ֺ᷼ ──‌─⏔⏔⏔─‌──‌ ︵ֺ᷼⏜ ︴ ᛝ ⋮ ɪɴ 𝘁𝗁𝖺𝘁 𝗰ᴀ𝘀ᴇ, 𝗓ᶻ ︴⠀︎⠀ Wᴇ𝗹𝗰ᴏ𝗺ᴇ 𝘁𝗼 ﹫ 𝑿i𝗴ᥱ𝗿is 𝗰𖹭𝗻𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𑄙𝗻 !

7 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @memecfXDPhoto

🙂ку!))) в4с пр№ветsтву3т ❌❌🤰🦄🤰🤪 🐈🧚 — есть годный мǝм4сиg, а никто из друзей не выкупит...( — все смешные картинки закончились, срочно нужно найти новые!! — бля, помню прикол, помогите найти 🌟ЗНАКОМО? ЧТО ЖЕ ДЕЛАТЬ???🌟 ™️ы попал прямо по назначению😁 ☝️угарай только с отборных мэмчэгов ☝️делись своими потешными интернет-изображениями ☝️стань крутым шутником и получай уважение от каждого человека ❌❌..признай, захо

5 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @embroideryCFPhoto

добро пожаловать в 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 confession 🎀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 - сделал схемы, а показать их некому 🐱 - хочу похвастаться, какую классную вышивку я сделал! 🤩 - у меня возникли трудности с вышивкой, подскажите, что делать? Если увидели здесь себя, то приглашаем вас в наш уютный мир вышивки! 🤩 @embroideryCF @embroideryCF @embroideryCF 🤩🤩🤩🤩 。 ♡  . @embroiderytakesbot・. . @embroideryCF • • . ✾ #takes !!

5 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @helpadapterhelpPhoto

🧦🦪🐸🧦🥑 🤩 🐶🌰🤰🌰🛡💩🪽🪽 🤩кф не гипер толератен и приветствуют аморальщину! 🪽🪽 🤩в этом кф вы можете попросить помочь в любой хуйне. до просьбы сделать домашку,поддержку в трудный период до того как сделать коктейль молотово или как попасть в даркнет🪽🪽 OWN: Рися🌟🌟 ❌❌ 🤩адаптер🤩

3 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Гок Неанон ками ── ⭑ ☆ ⭑ ── #тейк | @dbcftakebot

🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC25 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Человек феникс и Селл канон ── ⭑ ☆ ⭑ ── #тейк | @dbcftakebot

🌚1

27 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Супер 17 крутой но в джити ему нихуя времени не дали Неанон ками ── ⭑ ☆ ⭑ ── #тейк | @dbcftakebot

2

17 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟❤️ 🌟| 🆎дмины :: 🌟 - Годот | 🤩 | владелец ⭐️ - Руслан |🤩| админ по тейкам 🤖 - Леонда |🤩| админ по тейкам и вп ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🗡 Также набираем людей в администрацию !!!! Нам очень нужны люди для продвижения нашего КФ !!!! 👋 Условия просты, просто оставьте анкету в комментариях и мы рассмотрим его: 1. Псевдоним/Имя 2. Роль 3. Какой у вас опыт работы 👏

2

6 Jul 2026, 09:46 UTC67 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❤️🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟❤️ 🤨 🆎🆎 — 🆎🆎🆎🆎 🌟— 🆎опросы по поводу вп сюда! 🔍 🌟| 🆎ринимаем вп с 0️⃣+ подписчиков! 🐲 | 💪 Админ может отказаться от вп, не объясняя причины. | 🔷 Мы не несем ответственность за содержание каналов, с которыми делаем вп! 😊 🆎п удаляются через 1 день!

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dbconfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 514,697 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dragon Ball Confession” (@dbconfession), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dbconfession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.